My objection is not that I can't check out c-build, it's that it
interrupts checking out the whole mojo-sandbox.
Given that this has it's own trunk and branches, how about moving
this up to the top level (above the mojo trunk), instead of in the
sandbox?
- Brett
On 05/01/2007, at 12:39 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Please just leave them we're working on the constantly right now,
we're in a rush and we're all on unix. I don't care about Windows
right now and it's in the sandbox so it will have to remain like
that for the time being. It's not a priority right now. It's fine
for a requirement of getting out of the sandbox.
Please leave them alone for now.
Jason.
On 4 Jan 07, at 2:13 AM 4 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
c-builds people - wdyt?
On 27/12/2006, at 1:51 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
John,
Can we shrink some of the artifact Id's in your tests? I can't
checkout mojo on windows due to 'resolve-existing-patch-artifact-
with-subpath' because it appears twice in the path, plus
everything else.
- Brett
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
