On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Jerome Lacoste
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not sure why you call it beta after 1.0, is it a huge change and you
> > need user input?
> >
> > why not just call it 1.1, and then 1.1.x for bug fixes.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04073.html
>
> Now I have taken into account Benjamin's comments (thanks BTW).
>
> ALl issues I wanted to have for 1.1-beta-2 fixed. For 1.1 I've
> targeted 6, 2 of which I really would like to investigate & fix soon.
Of the 2 issues, one was already fixed as a side effect, the other I
cannot reproduce yet and also doubt is related to the exec plugin.
I've moved all 1.1 targeted non closed issues to a new "future"
release in jira, properly identified the "fix version" entries for
all issues targeted to 1.1 and renamed 1.1-beta-2 into 1.1.
I guess we're ready to release 1.1. The only code changes since the
last vote are checkstyle/pmd related and Benjamin's issue with
mkdirs() missing for log output file. This is an optional new feature
since 1.1-beta-1 so it won't be a regression for anyone.
I'll then proceed with a release. Issues will be adressed in 1.1.x or 1.2
Cheers,
Jerome
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
