+1 LieGrue, strub
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Brett Porter <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Brett Porter <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, April 8, 2011, 12:41 AM > > On 08/04/2011, at 3:38 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > I asked Cobertura-dev. Crickets. > > > > I think that Brett's position is that we're good to > go, but it can't > > hurt to check in with the management. > > > > Brett? > > My understanding is that at this point, it's purely a > policy decision of this project. > > I think as long as the code developed here remains licensed > under a business friendly license, then we should just > continue as is. We may want to note on the site that for > those intending to use or distribute the source code (as > opposed to using the plugin), that the licensing of > cobertura is complicated and they should seek their own > advice. > > However, I don't think we should make a habit of depending > on GPL code, and let's not accept new plugins since there is > already apache-extras, github, etc. for that. > > Do others agree? > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
