+1 -- Julien Ponge
On Friday, April 8, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > +1 > > 2011/4/8 Brett Porter <[email protected]>: > > > > On 08/04/2011, at 3:38 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > > > > I asked Cobertura-dev. Crickets. > > > > > > I think that Brett's position is that we're good to go, but it can't > > > hurt to check in with the management. > > > > > > Brett? > > > > My understanding is that at this point, it's purely a policy decision of > > this project. > > > > I think as long as the code developed here remains licensed under a > > business friendly license, then we should just continue as is. We may want > > to note on the site that for those intending to use or distribute the > > source code (as opposed to using the plugin), that the licensing of > > cobertura is complicated and they should seek their own advice. > > > > However, I don't think we should make a habit of depending on GPL code, and > > let's not accept new plugins since there is already apache-extras, github, > > etc. for that. > > > > Do others agree? > > > > - Brett > > > > -- > > Brett Porter > > [email protected] > > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy > http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >
