Den 23.06.2011 14:48, skrev nicolas de loof:
2011/6/23 Mark Struberg<[email protected]>

generally I'm

+1 for moving the repos from SVN to GIT

-1 for moving the repo from codehaus.org to github.
   Reason is that this would _heavily_ fragment this established community.
Why not just setup a GIT repo at codehaus? This is pretty easy, I could
volunteer on that.

I just wonder why this would fragment the community ? Do you mean we need a
single git repo for all mojo plugins to ensure we can easily share code
together (I'm -1 with this option) or maybe that this would fragment the
codehaus community (does this really exist ?)


I am a bit unsure as to what is the expected gain wrt moving the /authorative/ repo to github. I've said this earlier; an authorative repo located at codehaus with mirroring to github is practically the same. Handling pull requests is the only difference I can think of but it should be possible to get that set up as well.

Arnaud; wrt the differences in repo layout, I'm quite sure that can be handled. I'll give it a shot just as a test.

Kristian



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to