On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Kristian Rosenvold < [email protected]> wrote:
> Den 23.06.2011 14:48, skrev nicolas de loof: > > 2011/6/23 Mark Struberg<[email protected]> >> >> generally I'm >>> >>> +1 for moving the repos from SVN to GIT >>> >>> -1 for moving the repo from codehaus.org to github. >>> Reason is that this would _heavily_ fragment this established >>> community. >>> Why not just setup a GIT repo at codehaus? This is pretty easy, I could >>> volunteer on that. >>> >>> I just wonder why this would fragment the community ? Do you mean we >> need a >> single git repo for all mojo plugins to ensure we can easily share code >> together (I'm -1 with this option) or maybe that this would fragment the >> codehaus community (does this really exist ?) >> >> >> I am a bit unsure as to what is the expected gain wrt moving the > /authorative/ repo to github. I've said this earlier; > an authorative repo located at codehaus with mirroring to github is > practically the same. Handling pull requests is the only > difference I can think of but it should be possible to get that set up as > well. > The main issue I think of using github is to the management of rights which will have to be duplicated with what we have already in Codehaus/Xircles > > Arnaud; wrt the differences in repo layout, I'm quite sure that can be > handled. I'll give it a shot just as a test. > Thx. > > Kristian > > > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/**manage_email<http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email> > > >
