I don't care about the name, I care about _who_ will do that? You would need to duplicate Xircles and a lot other things...
LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 6/24/11, Julien Ponge <[email protected]> wrote: From: Julien Ponge <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] moving Mojo from svn to git To: [email protected] Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, 12:32 PM We'd better have a "codehaus-mojo" organization I think. Cheers -- Julien Ponge http://julien.ponge.info/ On vendredi 24 juin 2011 at 14:29, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 for each mojo plugin having it's own git module. This makes a lot sense because of moving single projects out from codehaus, etc. Also please note that tags and branches in GIT is over the _whole_ repository, and _not_ over a subdirectory! I'd have no problem with adding more features to maven-scm-providers-git or the maven-release-plugin/manager, but the tagging and branching would be a killer. We could setup git-submodules to pin those together of course. @ndloof: codehaus has a git hosting ability and we would need to signup codehaus as an organisation at github. But who would maintain that in this case? LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 6/24/11, Paul Gier <[email protected]> wrote: From: Paul Gier <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] moving Mojo from svn to git To: [email protected] Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, 1:14 AM Not sure I understand you. I wasn't saying we should have a single git repo, I was suggesting that each plugin/project is located in it's own git repo under the common directory "mojo". Instead of prefixing the name of the repo with "mojo-". Either way there is one git repo per mojo project. This would be somewhat similar to how the repos would be set up on github. For example: https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/gwt-maven-plugin https://github.com/codehaus-mojo/buildnumber-maven-plugin On the codehaus repo we could have something like http://git.codehaus.org/mojo/gwt-maven-plugin.git On 06/23/2011 05:54 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: until you try to release. if you release separately, you need separate git repositories. if you release at the same time, same git repo. so animal-sniffer would be one repo for the tools, one repo for each of the signatures. - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 23 Jun 2011 23:41, "Paul Gier" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
