[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=277935#comment-277935
]
Christopher Hunt commented on MOJO-1732:
----------------------------------------
>From @Robert
{quote}
Personally I don't like it when a mojo has getters and setters just for testing
purpose. Right now Plexus will use these methods to set the value, where the
@parameter fields are just enough. By using the AbstractMojoTestCase from the
maven-plugin-testing-harness you have the following methods to do the same
thing: setVariableValueToObject(Object, String, Object) and
getVariableValueFromObject(Object, String)
{quote}
I would say that this really highlights a deficiency within Java of course, and
I really don't like the getters and setters. However I really don't like
introspection as a means of breaking encapsulation so I'd say here that getters
and setters are tolerable.
> Create project for lesscss Mojo
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: MOJO-1732
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1732
> Project: Mojo
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: _Plugin Submission
> Reporter: Marcel Overdijk
> Assignee: Christopher Hunt
> Attachments: lesscss-maven-plugin.zip, lesscss-maven-plugin.zip,
> lesscss-maven-plugin.zip
>
>
> As discussed on the mailing list I'm working on a new Maven plugin for
> lesscss (www.lesscss.org).
> Less is the dynamic stylesheet language and the plugin will provide
> compilation of .less files to ordinary .css files, mainly during the compile
> or package (war) phase.
> Could you please create this project in the sandbox so I can work on this?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
