[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=282854#comment-282854
]
Robert Scholte commented on MOJO-1767:
--------------------------------------
Such a shame it has to be solved like this. I'll prefer to fix it with a
package called {{org.codehaus.mojo.extraenforcerrules.it}} and add some
clearification in the javadoc (both {{package-info}} and its classes). That's
all we can do to prevent the confusion right now.
And lets call the LogParser {{BanDuplicateClassesLogParser}} (you never know if
we ever want to make a ForceDuplicateClassesRule ;) ).
> Improve integration-test for MOJO-1744
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: MOJO-1767
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1767
> Project: Mojo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: extra-enforcer-rules
> Reporter: Robert Scholte
> Assignee: Robert Scholte
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LogParser.java, mojo-1744.it.2.patch
>
>
> With MOJO-1744 we have support for ignoring classes for specific dependencies.
> However, the IT seems unstable due to the usage of HashMaps (unpredictable
> order).
> The IT needs an improvement by ignoring the order, though every entry must be
> verified.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
