Wait a second, did you guys delete the tag and re-tag? (or modify tag?) :-o
Is this normal codehaus practice? Or is it because I just crawled out of
bed and am very wrong/confused?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:50:34 +0100
> Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> my +1
>
> tony.
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to release version 31 of the mojo-parent and version 12 of the
> mojo-sandbox-parent
> >
> > Diff between last release of mojo-parent:
> >
> https://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-parent/pom.xml?r1=16245&r2=17891
> >
> > m-surefire-p plugin and report version are now synch:) (thanks Anders
> for this one!)
> >
> > A lots of updates were done (https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1898
> ).
> >
> > There is also https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1722 fixed and
> > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1807.
> >
> > Note that m-compiler-p stays on version 2.5.1 since we do not need at
> the moment incremental compilation stuff (our project are not multi-module).
> >
> > Surefire
> > Staging Repositories:
> > General:  https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/
> > Exclusive:
> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-009/
> > (Staging) Site:
> > not available
> > SCM Tag:
> > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/mojo-parent-31
> > http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/mojo-sandbox-parent-12
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
> >
> > The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > tony.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

Reply via email to