I'm not annoyed, its not my place to be annoyed here. I just consider a tag as sacred, and skipping a version as something not to be ashamed of.
Version 2 of http://semver.org/ is pretty good. Version 1 had issues, but rather than fix those and still call it 1, he called it 2 :-) See point 4. I guess what it comes down to is how you define "released". To me a tag and a binary are synonymous. And yes, I understand the staged thing, but it's still evil to redistribute a new one, even if not to central, with the same version IMO. Apologies for the hijack. I won't vote, I've said too much already :-) Fred. On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:26:00 +0100 > Fred Cooke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > To me, yes, a cardinal sin. To others, perhaps not. I may be alone here? > > > Could you explain me why, because just saying I am annoyed won't help :( > > tony. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
