Lazy Consensus hit again :). +1 : Baptiste Mathus 0: -1:
I'll continue with the release process. Thanks 2013/11/7 Baptiste Mathus <[email protected]> > Thanks Robert. > Here's my +1 btw. > Le 5 nov. 2013 19:40, "Robert Scholte" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > There were duplicate issues, so in fact only 2 are resolved. >> I've fixed this for MOJO-1915 >> >> Robert >> >> Op Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:19:24 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus <[email protected] >> >: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the extra-enforcer-rules. >>> >>> These are extra rules for Apache Maven's Enforcer Plugin. >>> >>> We solved 3 issues: >>> https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >>> projectId=11062&version=19563 >>> >>> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >>> https://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D% >>> 20MOJO%20AND%20component%20%3D%20extra-enforcer-rules% >>> 20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY% >>> 20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC >>> >>> Staging Repositories: >>> General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/ >>> Exclusive: >>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-1026/ >>> >>> (Staging) Site: >>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-rules/ >>> >>> SCM Tag: >>> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-beta-2 >>> >>> Basically, this releases mainly includes an evolution for the >>> enforceBytecodeVersion rule to be able to exclude some classes from the >>> enforcement (thanks Jesse & Kohsuke). >>> >>> [ ] +1 >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 >>> >>> The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. >>> >>> Cheers >>> -- Baptiste >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
