Sometimes even 72h is not enough :S
This was a release I would have liked to verify with pleasure.
Anyhow, I enjoyed NL-Jug's JFall :)
Robert
Op Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:24:31 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus
<[email protected]>:
Lazy Consensus hit again :).
+1 : Baptiste Mathus
0:
-1:
I'll continue with the release process.
Thanks
2013/11/7 Baptiste Mathus <[email protected]>
Thanks Robert.
Here's my +1 btw.
Le 5 nov. 2013 19:40, "Robert Scholte" <[email protected]> a
écrit :
There were duplicate issues, so in fact only 2 are resolved.
I've fixed this for MOJO-1915
Robert
Op Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:19:24 +0100 schreef Baptiste Mathus
<[email protected]
>:
Hi,
I'd like to release version 1.0-beta-2 of the extra-enforcer-rules.
These are extra rules for Apache Maven's Enforcer Plugin.
We solved 3 issues:
https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
projectId=11062&version=19563
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%
20MOJO%20AND%20component%20%3D%20extra-enforcer-rules%
20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%
20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
Staging Repositories:
General: https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/
Exclusive:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-1026/
(Staging) Site:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-rules/
SCM Tag:
https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-beta-2
Basically, this releases mainly includes an evolution for the
enforceBytecodeVersion rule to be able to exclude some classes from
the
enforcement (thanks Jesse & Kohsuke).
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus.
Cheers
-- Baptiste
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
