Your call. If we re-roll, the MOJO-2004 should be deleted and that work be incorporated in MOJO-2002.
/Anders On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Tony Chemit <che...@codelutin.com> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:43:15 +0100 > Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> wrote: > > > I'm now changing my vote to 0. > > > > I'm not happy about the incorrect/confusing comments but the parent > should > > work. > > So we can just re-roll another release (I just realize I did not add (take > 2) in the vote email title ;)). > > It will be then ready for next week, I can survive this ;) > > I cancel the vote ? > > > > > > > The release notes has changed and there are now four documented issues > > fixed for this release. > > > > /Anders > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net> > wrote: > > > > > > The vote mail says that there were 2 solved issues, but the release > notes > > >> > lists 3. > > >> > MOJO-2002 is marked "won't fix" but there was actually some change > > >> applied > > >> > which is wrong. > > >> Does it really matters ? for people using the mojo-parent I don't > think > > >> so. > > >> > > >> I mark a issue as *Won't fix*? so for me 2 issues are solved, is this > > >> wrong? > > >> > > > > > > The thing is that MOJO-2002 does have a fix applied. Maven 2.2.1 is > now a > > > requirement for building mojo-parent, so it shouldn't be marked as > "won't > > > fix". Also, if a ticket is marked as "won't fix" it should not have a > fix > > > version assigned as it then is listed in the release notes (which > confuses > > > people). > > > > > > > > >> > I guess we could change MOJO-2002 to "fixed" and then create a > separate > > >> > ticket to fix the remaining unwanted changes for the next version. > > >> However, > > >> > we would then have a change in what phase the enforcer plugin runs > > >> which I > > >> > don't know is intentional (although makes sense). The latter could > be > > >> > handled by creating a new ticket for this change. > > >> > > >> Could you then do this I am a bit lost with what you want to do?. > > >> > > > > > > Ok, I'll do this. > > > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > >> > > >> I would just want to use a new mojo-parent with correct MOJO-1946 > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> > > >> tony. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Tony Chemit > > >> -------------------- > > >> tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 > > >> http://www.codelutin.com > > >> email: che...@codelutin.com > > >> twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > >> > > >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Tony Chemit > -------------------- > tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28 > http://www.codelutin.com > email: che...@codelutin.com > twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
