In 1.8 release, there was a license issue regarding the font used in 
mkldnn/onednn doc, which is currently packaged in mxnet source releases [1]. I 
tested locally on a mac that removing 3rdparty/mkldnn/doc doesn't affect the 
build so I suggest we simply remove it during release.

[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf809c7b700d4523f73f8b376ce106719fbf000eff898b5ed8e97b486%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Thanks,
Sheng

On 2021/02/18 03:58:14, Wei Chu <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Thank you Sheng for the info. I'll update this item on runbook accordingly.
> 
> Best,
> Wei
> 
> On 2021/02/18 01:27:58, Sheng Zha <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > I can comment on the second item.
> > 
> > > Similarly, we have a step for <Ensure that PR verification is enabled for 
> > > the target release branch> in the runbook. This step has not been 
> > > executed after MXNet 1.4 release: 
> > > https://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/job/incubator-mxnet/.
> > 
> > The branch protection is enabled for all release branches based on the name 
> > regex in INFRA-20471 [1] so that it doesn't require manual setting as long 
> > as the naming convention is kept.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Sheng
> > 
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20471
> > 
> > On 2021/02/17 23:53:18, Wei Chu <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > > Hi dev community,
> > > 
> > > In the MXNet release runbook, we have a step for <Backward Compatibility 
> > > checker>: 
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-NightlyTests
> > > This step is a part of the nightly test pipeline and it's been failing in 
> > > the past 11 months: 
> > > https://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/view/Nightly%20Tests/
> > > 
> > > Similarly, we have a step for <Ensure that PR verification is enabled for 
> > > the target release branch> in the runbook. This step has not been 
> > > executed after MXNet 1.4 release: 
> > > https://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/job/incubator-mxnet/. 
> > > 
> > > I am wondering if these two steps are still needed? If not, can we 
> > > consider to remove them from the runbook? 
> > > 
> > > Best,
> > > Wei
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to