Thanks John. I will create the JIRA tickets to track your inputs as requested.
Meghna > On Aug 29, 2017, at 6:14 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > Ok, so here's my +1 to release, with the following notes: > > - The NOTICE file is wrong. Unless the dependencies listed have explicit > notice requirements (they don't seem to) nothing needs to be added to the > NOTICE file. > - The source headers should be reverted in any areas where not all > contributors to that file have signed ICLAs, otherwise we need some kind of > agreement they are OK with moving to NOTICE file (which is how this has > been handled in the past). > > Please create JIRAs to track these. > > John > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:09 PM Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org > <mailto:bay...@apache.org>> wrote: > >> I believe all the major contributors were ICLA'd, and I disagree that all >> contributors need to SGA/ICLA; we don't do that for an existing project. >> >> We need to do the check to see how the footprint of contributions for the >> largest contributor without an ICLA is (apologies for the horrible wording >> there). There are over 400 contributors, but (quickly eyeballing) most are >> covered by ICLA or small contributions. Note that we also have clause 5 of >> Apache 2.0 at play for historical contributions here. >> >> To John's point on source headers; the previous source headers said >> "Copyright <year> by Contributors". >> >> Hen >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:01 Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Henri, >>> >>> If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed >> to >>> the project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part >> of >>> IP Clearance. >>> >>> It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0. >>> >>> Are there any contributors to the project before it came to the incubator >>> who are not now committers? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Craig >>> >>>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Apologies - I missed that mentors hadn't voted on the podling release. >>> Will >>>> review tonight; hopefully their mentors can do similar. >>>> >>>> There's no reason for an SGA here (and who would even sign it?). Code >> has >>>> been apache 2.0 since the initial commit on GitHub. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:45 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dominic, >>>>> >>>>> One question, from looking a second time. Was MXNet always Apache >>> Licensed >>>>> (prior to coming to the ASF)? >>>>> >>>>> John >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:39 AM Dominic Divakaruni < >>>>> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the reply, John. None of the mentors have voted so far. >>>>>> Henri, Suneel, Marcus, Sebastian, can you gents please review and >> vote? >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, Henri, didn't you mention that there was an SGA for this >> project? >>>>>> Sorry if I don't recollect the exact details on the SGA bit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dom >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 AM, John D. Ament < >> johndam...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Non pmc members can vote non-binding. Usually mentors review >>> releases. >>>>>>> Have any of your mentors reviewed and voted on it? Due to there >> being >>>>> no >>>>>>> SGA its a harder release to review. I also need to cross check >> ICLAs >>>>> and >>>>>>> files that have changed license. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 29, 2017 8:13 AM, "Dominic Divakaruni" < >>>>>>> dominic.divakar...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can this vote pass without the three +1's from the PMC? Can the >>>>>>> committers >>>>>>>> for this project provide binding votes on general@ to weigh in on >>>>> this >>>>>>>> release? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Meghna Baijal < >>>>>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>> This is a reminder that the vote to release MXNet (incubating) >>>>> 0.11.0 >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> still open. >>>>>>>>> The vote will close on Tuesday, August 29, 2017 8.04 PM UTC. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because… >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Meghna >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Meghna Baijal < >>>>>>> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.11.0, >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>> candidate 3. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Apache MXNet community has voted and approved the release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Vote thread: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea >>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < >>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2695a598ae0622484d4c886dc5b2ea >>>>>>>>> 823c306ca4ebef66accec6ee76@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Result thread: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 >>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E < >>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d860c49194ec71c5c83ac0fa68df13 >>>>>>>>> 050dbfada4ff7052be3401fc1b@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be >>>>>> found >>>>>>>> at: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The release tag can be found here: >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3 < >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/0.11.0.rc3> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The release hash is ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd and >>>>>> can >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> found here: >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/ >>>>>>>>> ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd < >>>>> https://github.com/apache/ >>>>>>>>> incubator-mxnet/commit/ba6413d29769075dd883ec5fe6eb24afc98fb3fd> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: >>>>>>>>>> AA3EBCC3E65A768AE3D2A64B8EF47B8720E8C549 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> KEY files are available here: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/0.11.0.rc3/ >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For information about the contents of this release, see: >>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. >>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate < >>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/v0. >>>>>>>>> 11.0+Release+Notes+-+MXNet+v0.11+Release+Candidate> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 0.1.0 >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni >>>>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dominic Divakaruni >>>>>> 206.475.9200 <(206)%20475-9200> <(206)%20475-9200> Cell >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> Craig L Russell >>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation >>> c...@apache.org <mailto:c...@apache.org> http://db.apache.org/jdo >>> <http://db.apache.org/jdo>
