I think it's a good idea Anirudh. It should help users easily get MXNet up and running whether they're running services, following tutorials, etc.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 8:10 AM Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think we need for JVM languages, they have a good dependency > management through Maven Central. We weren't publishing regularly to Maven, > now we do. > > Anirudh, I am guessing you are interested docker for R language, If the R > packages were published to CRAN do you still see a need for docker ? Could > you elaborate how this would be helpful and easy if they were to use other > packages in CRAN? > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Anirudh Acharya <anirudhk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Yes, correct cu90 is indeed there, thanks for pointing it. > > > > So the question, should we be publishing to Docker Hub as part of the > > release process so that bindings other than python are also published and > > there is a policy on what cuda versions we publish? > > > > > > Thanks > > ANirudh > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:56 PM Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > cu90 and cu90mkl are also available, see > > > https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/tags/ > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Anirudh Acharya < > anirudhk...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > The python binding that is actively maintained is > > > > > > > > mxnet-mkl 1.2.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Other versions that use CUDA like mxnet-cu<xx> and mxnet-cu<xx>mkl > are > > > not > > > > actively maintained. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > Anirudh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:09 PM Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Surprisingly only the python binding is actively maintained. I > > remember > > > > we > > > > > can easily push all bindings into docker hub through the script in > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/master/docker. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Anirudh Acharya < > > > anirudhk...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Docker Hub( https://hub.docker.com/u/mxnet/ ) currently hosts > > images > > > > of > > > > > > MXNet and its various bindings but it is not actively maintained. > > > > Should > > > > > we > > > > > > publish MXNet images to Docker Hub as part of the release process > > and > > > > > > actively maintain it? > > > > > > > > > > > > The pros of publishing docker images would be ease of use and > > access > > > to > > > > > our > > > > > > users. Is this something that should be included as part of the > > > release > > > > > > process? What does the community think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Anirudh Acharya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
