Awesome. Thanks Meghna. On Wed, Jul 25, 2018, 11:08 PM Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Anirudh, > Thanks for bringing this up. > The Python Images are being actively released for each MXNet version. Until > last release I was using the script Mu has pointed out but from 1.2.1 I > replaced these dockerfiles to use the pip binaries instead of building from > source. > Images for all other language bindings were being released only until MXNet > 0.12.0 since they were not being maintained. I think there are a couple of > github issues open to track broken dockerfiles. > > Kellen, > > I can help you publish the docker images to dockerhub. > > > Thanks, > > Meghna Baijal > > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:45 PM Anirudh Acharya <anirudhk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Yes that would be good. Also I just noticed that in the Installation > > instructions page only python has docker image installation instruction > > here - > > > > > http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html?platform=Linux&language=Python&processor=CPU > > Similar instructions need to be there for other bindings too. > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:04 PM kellen sunderland < > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I was actually interested in pushing a version of MXNet with TensorRT > > > enabled some time in the next few weeks just so that people can > > experiment > > > with the feature without worrying about installing the right protoc and > > > onnx versions. If people here think it's a good idea I can open a PR > > with > > > a runtime-docker folder with the intent that this work could be a > > template > > > for others who want to contribute runtime Dockerfiles? If a few > > > contributors do put together an Dockerfile with TensorRT enabled, would > > it > > > be possible to get that image pushed to the MXNet Dockerhub repo by a > > > committer? > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 3:57 PM Anirudh Acharya <anirudhk...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > @Naveen No, I meant in general, for all bindings. Irrespective of > > whether > > > > we use a package management repository, being able to pull an image > > from > > > > docker hub would be convenient for anyone wanting to get started on > > MXNet > > > > or run services( as Kellen said). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:20 AM kellen sunderland < > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think it's a good idea Anirudh. It should help users easily get > > > MXNet > > > > up > > > > > and running whether they're running services, following tutorials, > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 8:10 AM Naveen Swamy <mnnav...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think we need for JVM languages, they have a good > > dependency > > > > > > management through Maven Central. We weren't publishing regularly > > to > > > > > Maven, > > > > > > now we do. > > > > > > > > > > > > Anirudh, I am guessing you are interested docker for R language, > If > > > > the R > > > > > > packages were published to CRAN do you still see a need for > docker > > ? > > > > > Could > > > > > > you elaborate how this would be helpful and easy if they were to > > use > > > > > other > > > > > > packages in CRAN? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Anirudh Acharya < > > > > anirudhk...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, correct cu90 is indeed there, thanks for pointing it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the question, should we be publishing to Docker Hub as part > of > > > the > > > > > > > release process so that bindings other than python are also > > > published > > > > > and > > > > > > > there is a policy on what cuda versions we publish? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > ANirudh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:56 PM Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cu90 and cu90mkl are also available, see > > > > > > > > https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/tags/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Anirudh Acharya < > > > > > > anirudhk...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The python binding that is actively maintained is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mxnet-mkl 1.2.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Other versions that use CUDA like mxnet-cu<xx> and > > > > mxnet-cu<xx>mkl > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > actively maintained. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anirudh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 9:09 PM Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Surprisingly only the python binding is actively > > maintained. > > > I > > > > > > > remember > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > can easily push all bindings into docker hub through the > > > script > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/master/docker > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Anirudh Acharya < > > > > > > > > anirudhk...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Docker Hub( https://hub.docker.com/u/mxnet/ ) > currently > > > > hosts > > > > > > > images > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > MXNet and its various bindings but it is not actively > > > > > maintained. > > > > > > > > > Should > > > > > > > > > > we > > > > > > > > > > > publish MXNet images to Docker Hub as part of the > release > > > > > process > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > actively maintain it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The pros of publishing docker images would be ease of > use > > > and > > > > > > > access > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > users. Is this something that should be included as > part > > of > > > > the > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > process? What does the community think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > Anirudh Acharya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
