Hi, I have created a wiki for tracking MXNet 1.3 release with the timeline. Please take a look here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.3.0+Release+Status
I am still waiting for following 2 PRs to get merged: TRT integration: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 Gluon RNN: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482 *Code freeze date is 08/02(Thursday).* Kindly try to complete ongoing work and get these PRs merged. Thanks, Roshani On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:02 PM Roshani Nagmote <roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is an update on MXNet 1.3 release: > I am still waiting for following PRs to get merged: > > TRT integration: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 > Gluon RNN: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11482 > Scala examples: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11753 > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11621 > > *New code freeze date is: 08/03* Please try to get your ongoing PRs > merged by then. > > @Pedro, I didn't include your PRs in tracking list as you said those are > not critical for now. Please let me know if those needs to be included. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636 > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562 > > I also have updated project proposal cwiki page to update the status of > PRs. > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release> > > Please let me know if I am missing something. > > Thanks, > Roshani > > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:34 PM Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I would like to get these PR merged: >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11636 >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11562 >> >> How much longer until the code freeze? >> >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:44 AM Roshani Nagmote < >> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > PRs waiting to be merged for 1.3 release: >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 >> > >> > Are there any other PRs waiting to get merged? Please let me know. >> > >> > Release blocker issue: >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11853 >> > >> > @Marco, @Kellen, Thanks for bringing up the important topic. I agree >> with >> > you and we(internal Amazon team) will be working on fixing the disabled >> > tests. >> > Currently, my colleague, Hao Jin is working on compiling the list of >> > disabled tests and leading the effort to fix them in the next few days. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Roshani >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM kellen sunderland < >> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks again for organizing Roshani. I believe the TensorRT work is >> > ready >> > > for a merge. Thanks to Marek and all the NVIDIA people for iterating >> on >> > > it. If possible could a committer review, make sure it meets their >> > > expectations and then merge? PR is here: >> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11325 >> > > >> > > To Marco's point. I'd recommend we review some of those disabled >> tests >> > and >> > > see how likely they are to affect users before we cut a release. >> Many of >> > > them are obviously not too important from a user's point of view (e.g. >> > > downloading a sometimes-offline image in a test). One idea would be >> to >> > try >> > > and address as many of the customer impacting issues as possible >> between >> > > code freeze and the RC0 vote. >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:23 PM Marco de Abreu >> > > <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hello Roshani, >> > > > >> > > > frequent releases are good and I'm supportive for this in general in >> > > order >> > > > to provide our users with the latest features and improvements. But >> at >> > > the >> > > > moment, I'm slightly concerned about the test coverage due to [1]. I >> > want >> > > > us to be conscious about cutting a release even though not all tests >> > are >> > > > enabled (29 disabled tests [2] as of today). However, I acknowledge >> > that >> > > we >> > > > have improved by a lot lately thanks to everybody participating and >> > > leading >> > > > the efforts around improving flaky tests. From a retrospective >> point of >> > > > view, we could say that these efforts have actually revealed some >> quite >> > > > interesting bugs and thus the time was well spent and yielded good >> > > results. >> > > > >> > > > What does the community think about making another sprint of >> > improvements >> > > > around tests followed up by a period of 1-2 weeks during which we >> > observe >> > > > the failures closely to ensure that no critical paths are impacted? >> If >> > we >> > > > are in a good shape by then, we could continue the release process >> and >> > at >> > > > the same time have the advantage of giving contributors more lead >> time >> > to >> > > > finish their work to ensure it gets into the release in the desired >> > > > quality. >> > > > >> > > > Again, thanks to everybody for their efforts during the last weeks >> to >> > > > improve the usability and stability of MXNet. This is great >> community >> > > > effort and a good example of a community working together towards a >> > > unified >> > > > goal! >> > > > >> > > > Best regards, >> > > > Marco >> > > > >> > > > [1]: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d6d81401de796a96677a112d6cd0b074b01f46564194ea89b86c6a3e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E >> > > > [2]: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22Disabled+test%22 >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 8:34 PM Roshani Nagmote < >> > > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com >> > > > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > >> > > > > As mentioned before, code freeze date is today July 23rd. Please >> try >> > to >> > > > get >> > > > > your ongoing PRs merged by today. >> > > > > Please let me know if there are any concerns or need more time. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Roshani >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 1:16 PM Anirudh Acharya < >> > anirudhk...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > @sandeep krishnamurthy <sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> the bug >> fixes >> > > in >> > > > > the >> > > > > > R-package is something we have just begun, there will not be >> > anything >> > > > > > significant to announce before the v1.3 code freeze. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:08 PM Steffen Rochel < >> > > > steffenroc...@gmail.com >> > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > To make it easier to find the discussions related to project >> > > > proposals >> > > > > I >> > > > > > > added a column with a link to the thread on dev@ for most >> > > projects. >> > > > > > > Appreciate for the project owners to fill in the blanks and to >> > > check >> > > > > > that I >> > > > > > > got the right threads. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > > Steffen >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:11 PM Roshani Nagmote < >> > > > > > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Kellen, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sure. I will update the notes with the information. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > > Roshani >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 3:01 PM kellen sunderland < >> > > > > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hey Roshani, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Would you be able to add 'TensorRT Runtime Integration' to >> > the >> > > > list >> > > > > > of >> > > > > > > > > upcoming features? We'll target getting the release in >> and >> > > > > polished >> > > > > > by >> > > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > > 23rd. Design proposal is here: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Runtime+Integration+with+TensorRT >> > > > > > > > > and the lead contributor is Marek Kolodziej. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > -Kellen >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 8:32 PM Roshani Nagmote < >> > > > > > > > roshaninagmo...@gmail.com >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi All, >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I am starting the process to prepare for Apache MXNet >> > > > > (incubating) >> > > > > > > 1.3 >> > > > > > > > > > Release. Please find project proposal draft for this >> > release >> > > > > here: >> > > > > > > > > > <* >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release >> > > > > > > > > > < >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release >> > > > > > > > > > >* >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Target feature freeze date is July 23rd. A release >> > candidate >> > > > will >> > > > > > be >> > > > > > > > cut >> > > > > > > > > > around Monday, August 6th and voting will commence from >> > then >> > > > > until >> > > > > > > > > > Thursday, August 9th. If you have any additional >> features >> > in >> > > > > > progress >> > > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > > > would like to include it in this release, please make >> sure >> > to >> > > > > > comment >> > > > > > > > so >> > > > > > > > > I >> > > > > > > > > > can update the release notes. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Feel free to add any other comments/suggestions. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > > > > Roshani >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
