>> I also believe that it is possible to install more recent >> versions of Visual Studio on Windows 7.
It's about security reasons and AD permissions and bought licenses for VS, not about general technical impossibility of installation of up-to-date versions. On Sunday, September 2, 2018, Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > Thanks for the data and these quite important points. I agree and hereby > change my vote to -1. > > Barber, Christopher <christopher.bar...@analog.com> schrieb am So., 2. > Sep. > 2018, 18:56: > > > FWIW, my company is only beginning to transition to Windows 10 now, and > my > > past experience would lead me to believe that many enterprises stick with > > old versions of Windows long past when you think they would. > > > > Seems to me that if you are unwilling to deprecate python 2.7, then > > continuing to support Windows 7 is a no-brainer. You are more likely to > get > > users to switch to python 3 than you are to get them to install a new > > operating system. > > > > And do you really want to drop support for platforms that your > competitors > > still support? Given MXNet's market share, I wouldn't dream of dropping a > > platform until after the more popular frameworks have already done so. > > > > I also believe that it is possible to install more recent versions of > > Visual Studio on Windows 7. > > > > On 9/2/18, 1:57 AM, "kellen sunderland" <kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Google analytics are sadly probably the best numbers we're going to > > get. > > Of course these numbers are likely to over-represent windows usage, > as > > I'm > > sure many people are looking up documentation on a windows machine > > while > > ssh'd into a cloud instance or IoT device. > > > > What's the trend over time for these numbers Mu? Is Windows 7 usage > > relatively stable over the last year? > > > > On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 1:58 AM Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > According to google analytics, ~12% users who visited mxnet's > > website are > > > using Windows 7. It's a significant number. Even though we cannot > > conclude > > > that all of these users will run MXNet on Windows 7, I suggest we > > still > > > support win7. > > > > > > BTW, anyone who can access mxnet's google analytics report can > > verify this > > > number by following this instruction: > > > > > > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1340778/detecting- > windows-7-with-google-analytics > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM Steffen Rochel < > > steffenroc...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I support a data driven decision. Any suggestions how we can > obtain > > > insight > > > > about OS usage of the MXNet user community? > > > > Can we get such information from pip install statistics or should > > we > > > > perform a user poll on the discussion forum? > > > > On the other hand the lack of data should not prevent us from > > moving > > > > forward and dropping support for outdated OS. > > > > In any case we would have to announce dropping a platform support > > at > > > least > > > > a release in advance. > > > > Steffen > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:21 PM Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Kellen, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the explanation. Unfortunately, I don't have the > > usage data, > > > > so > > > > > I refrained from voting. If any of the voters have such data > I'd > > love > > > to > > > > > see it too. > > > > > > > > > > -sz > > > > > > > > > > On 2018/08/30 14:58:09, kellen sunderland < > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > I haven't spoken to anyone about the decision (as I'm > > currently on an > > > > > > island in the med) but to me the quick +1s are likely a > result > > of > > > this > > > > > > being a fairly straightforward decision. The factors that > > went into > > > my > > > > > > thinking were (1) prioritizing growing platforms rather than > > > shrinking > > > > > > platforms (i.e. thinking long term rather than shirt term) > and > > (2) > > > > > earning > > > > > > our customers' trust. Claiming support for a platform when > we > > can't > > > > > > realistically deliver it would lose us trust. I'd prefer to > > over > > > > deliver > > > > > > and under promise when it come to windows 7 for this reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now on the flip side one thing I would see as valuable is to > > try and > > > > get > > > > > > windows builds working with clang. This could be beneficial > > in the > > > > sense > > > > > > that it would be easy to maintain for mxnet devs and allow us > > to use > > > > > modern > > > > > > cpp on older windows machines without using vs 2013(which I > > consider > > > a > > > > > > non-starter with our codebase). > > > > > > > > > > > > You have peaked my curiousity though Sheng. How many win7 > > users does > > > > > MXNet > > > > > > have relative to macos/Linux? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018, 8:51 AM Sheng Zha <szha....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Yuan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No problem. This is an issue that's worth having a clear > > > definition, > > > > so > > > > > > > there's nothing wrong about your proposal, and thanks for > > bringing > > > > > this up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm more concerned about the seemingly unanimous votes on > > dropping > > > > > support > > > > > > > on a platform without seeing the supporting evidence that > > it's the > > > > > right > > > > > > > thing. It is as if everyone who participated in the vote > are > > > already > > > > > on the > > > > > > > same page, and somehow I'm the only one that's not. But the > > only > > > > > argument I > > > > > > > hear so far is that it's technically not straightforward to > > > continue > > > > > the > > > > > > > support, which, coming from Amazon folks, certainly doesn't > > sound > > > > > > > customer-obsessed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -sz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:37 PM Lin Yuan < > > apefor...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Sheng, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for raising this concern. The problem now is that > we > > > cannot > > > > > even > > > > > > > > build MXNet on Windows 7 because the build process > > requires MS VS > > > > > 2015 w/ > > > > > > > > update 3 which is incompatible on Windows 7. This leaves > > many > > > > > Windows 7 > > > > > > > > related open issues on github without any timely > response. > > In my > > > > > opinion, > > > > > > > > having no response to users' request is probably even > > worse than > > > > > letting > > > > > > > > them know the limitation of OS support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To minimize the impact to current Windows 7 users, we can > > provide > > > > > PyPi > > > > > > > > package for Windows 7 in this release but defer the bug > > fix and > > > > > feature > > > > > > > > enhancement to later Windows OS version. Based on users' > > > feedbacks, > > > > > we > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > then officially discontinue the Windows 7 support in the > > next > > > MXNet > > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will appreciate your comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:37 PM Sheng Zha < > > szha....@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are any of the votes based on any measure of user > > impact, if we > > > > > indeed > > > > > > > > > decide not to fix the current problems? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -sz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:29 PM Hagay Lupesko < > > > lupe...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for raising this Lin! > > > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting to do it as part of MXNet 1.3? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:14 AM Srivastava, Rohit > > Kumar < > > > > > > > > > > srivastava....@buckeyemail.osu.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/29/18, 8:39 AM, "sandeep krishnamurthy" < > > > > > > > > > > sandeep.krishn...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 Thanks for bringing this up. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 6:38 AM Marco de Abreu > > > > > > > > > > > <marco.g.ab...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:08 PM kellen > > sunderland < > > > > > > > > > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 1:18 AM Anirudh > > Acharya < > > > > > > > > > > > anirudhk...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for discontinuing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:11 PM Naveen > > Swamy < > > > > > > > > > > mnnav...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 to stop supporting Win7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 3:54 PM Lin > Yuan > > < > > > > > > > > > > apefor...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Community, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, our MXNet installation > > guide for > > > > > Windows > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Windows 7. e.g. Microsoft Visual > > Studio 2015 > > > is > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > supported on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Windows > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/vs/support/vs2015/received-error- > specified-program-requires-newer-version-windows/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, MSFT ended “Mainstream” > > support > > > > for > > > > > > > > Windows > > > > > > > > > 7 > > > > > > > > > > > in 2015 > > > > > > > > > > > > ( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/13853/windows- > lifecycle-fact-sheet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore, it is not possible for > > developers > > > to > > > > > build > > > > > > > > > MXNet > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > verify > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fix on Windows 7 platform. Given that > > there > > > > have > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > several > > > > > > > > > > > > issues > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MXNet error on Windows 7 (issue#9271 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/9271 > > > > > > > > >, > > > > > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > > > > #8921 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8921 > > > > > > > > >, > > > > > > > > > > > issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > #11163 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11163 > > > > > > > > > >), > > > > > > > > > > > it will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > add > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > more burden on developers in the > > future if we > > > > > were to > > > > > > > > > > > continue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > supporting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Windows 7. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I therefore would like to propose > that > > we > > > > > discontinue > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > support > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > MXNet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on Windows 7 in the next release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Specifically, this means the > following > > > required > > > > > > > > actions: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) state the discontinuation of > > Windows 7 > > > > > support in > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > release > > > > > > > > > > > > note > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) update the MXNet webpage if > Windows > > > version > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > mentioned. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) update the open Github issues > > related to > > > > > Windows 7 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please share your thoughts about this > > > proposal > > > > > and/or > > > > > > > > > > > suggest if > > > > > > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any other missing action item from > the > > above. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > Sandeep Krishnamurthy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
