+1 This will be very useful for increasing our committer pool that has expertise in various components and not necessarily across and complete in-depth expertise. This will have mainly 3 major positive impact on the project: 1. Will greatly help in managing PRs and issues with fast turn around. There by more activity and frustration free contributions and hence more people eligible for committership. A positive cycle effect in community building. Currently this is a most critical missing piece in the project that is delaying and not so great quick start for new contributions.
2. Increase in committer pool is more motivation for more people to be part of the MXNet community and contribute and learn more parts of the project and increase their expertise. 3. PMC being able to focus on more critical decision making and steer the direction. However, like others suggested, success of this whole effort will be based on defining clear responsibility of PMC, committers and path for the community to be part of committers and PMC. On Wed, Oct 10, 2018, 3:37 AM Isabel Drost-Fromm <isa...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Am 10. Oktober 2018 11:04:30 MESZ schrieb kellen sunderland < > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com>: > > My > >impression is there's a high degree of knowledge and experience > >required to > >make strategic design decisions on the project. > > This statement indicates a certain understanding of what a PMC actually > does. As a first step, would everyone please state their perspective on > what their understanding of what the role committer, PMC member and PMC > chair actually are? I really want to make sure we are talking about the > same things here. > > Isabel > > > -- > Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet. >
