+1 non-binding Thanks for driving the vote Carin! On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:31 AM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure PPMC stands for Podling Project Management Committee - > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html - I updated the document to > have ",(Podling Project Management Committee)," in the both sections with > a link where the abbreviation is first introduced. > > - Carin > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:09 PM Aaron Markham <aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 non-binding > > One minor thing first: can you define PPMC in the doc? It's brought in > > without saying what it stands for. Even the link it goes to just talks > > about PMC and there's no mention of PMCC... so I'm not sure what the > > definition is. > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:07 AM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > From the feedback in the thread. I changed the wording of "Privileges" > to > > > "Rights and Responsibilities". > > > > > > If I misunderstood anything, please let me know. > > > > > > Best, > > > Carin > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:00 AM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 since the Beam model is much more open than the current one. > > > > > > > > Here my two cents to the discussion: > > > > > > > > You can see that in the past was different,, but we had evolved as > > > > foundation. As general recommendation, the new way is to spend less > > > effort > > > > in ad-hoc bylaws on every project/podling and adopt the general ones. > > The > > > > easier the project is managed, normally the better the community > > evolves. > > > > > > > > In addition, as a linguistic detail: commiters and/or pmc do not have > > > more > > > > "privileges", but "responsibilities". > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 15:47 Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This vote is to adopt the document > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal > > > > > to replace the current document > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer > > > > > > > > > > The dev discussion thread is here > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined > > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > > > > > > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority > rule > > > > unless > > > > > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than > > > > > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- > > regardless > > > > of > > > > > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems > > too > > > > > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is > > > > typically > > > > > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus > > > > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for > a > > > > > modifying factor.) > > > > > > > > > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Carin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
