>From the feedback in the thread. I changed the wording of "Privileges" to "Rights and Responsibilities".
If I misunderstood anything, please let me know. Best, Carin On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 7:00 AM Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 since the Beam model is much more open than the current one. > > Here my two cents to the discussion: > > You can see that in the past was different,, but we had evolved as > foundation. As general recommendation, the new way is to spend less effort > in ad-hoc bylaws on every project/podling and adopt the general ones. The > easier the project is managed, normally the better the community evolves. > > In addition, as a linguistic detail: commiters and/or pmc do not have more > "privileges", but "responsibilities". > > Cheers, > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018, 15:47 Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This vote is to adopt the document > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal > > to replace the current document > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer > > > > The dev discussion thread is here > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > > > > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > > > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule > unless > > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than > > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- regardless > of > > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems too > > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is > typically > > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus > > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a > > modifying factor.) > > > > The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST > > > > Thanks, > > Carin > > >
