Thanks, Steffen. I think there is NO open issue to block the MKLDNN to GA now.

BTW, several quantization related PRs (#13297,#13260) are under the review and 
I think it can be merged in this week.

Thanks,

--Patric


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 2:57 AM
> To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0 release
> 
> On Friday the contributors working on Java API discovered a potential
> performance problem with inference using Java API vs. Python. Investigation
> is ongoing.
> As the Java API is one of the main features for the upcoming release, I
> suggest to post-pone the code freeze towards end of this week.
> 
> Please provide feedback and concern about the change in dates for code
> freeze and 1.4.0 release. I will provide updates on progress resolving the
> potential performance problem.
> 
> Patrick - do you think it is possible to resolve the remaining issues on MKL-
> DNN this week, so we can consider GA for MKL-DNN with 1.4.0?
> 
> Regards,
> Steffen
> 
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:26 AM Anton Chernov <mecher...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to remind everyone that 'code freeze' would mean cutting a
> > v1.4.x release branch and all following fixes would need to be backported.
> > Development on master can be continued as usual.
> >
> > Best
> > Anton
> >
> > ср, 14 нояб. 2018 г. в 6:04, Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > the agreed plan was to establish code freeze for 1.4.0 release
> > > today. As the 1.3.1 patch release is still ongoing I suggest to
> > > post-pone the code freeze to Friday 16th November 2018.
> > >
> > > Sergey Kolychev has agreed to act as co-release manager for all
> > > tasks
> > which
> > > require committer privileges. If anybody is interested to volunteer
> > > as release manager - now is the time to speak up. Otherwise I will
> > > manage
> > the
> > > release.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Steffen
> > >
> >

Reply via email to