Hey Steffen, I'd like to be able to merge this PR for version 1.4: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/13310 . It fixes a regression in master which causes incorrect feature vectors to be output when using the TensorRT feature. (Thanks to Nathalie for helping me track down the root cause of the issue). I'm currently blocked on a CI issue I haven't seen before, but hope to have it resolved by EOW.
One call-out I would make is that we currently don't support Turing architecture (sm_75). I've been slowly trying to add support, but I don't think I'd have capacity to do this done by EOW. Does anyone feel strongly we need this in the 1.4 release? From my perspective this will already be a strong release without it. On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:42 PM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Patrick, lets target to get the PR's merged this week. > > Call for contributions from the community: Right now we have 10 PR awaiting > merge > < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-merge+ > > > and > we have 61 open PR awaiting review. > < > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Apr-awaiting-review > > > I would appreciate if you all can help to review the open PR and the > committers can drive the merge before code freeze for 1.4.0. > > The contributors on the Java API are making progress, but not all > performance issues are resolved. With some luck it should be possible to > code freeze towards end of this week. > > Are there other critical features/bugs/PR you think need to be included in > 1.4.0? If so, please communicate as soon as possible. > > Regards, > Steffen > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:26 PM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks, Steffen. I think there is NO open issue to block the MKLDNN to GA > > now. > > > > BTW, several quantization related PRs (#13297,#13260) are under the > review > > and I think it can be merged in this week. > > > > Thanks, > > > > --Patric > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Steffen Rochel [mailto:steffenroc...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 2:57 AM > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [Announce] Upcoming Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0 > release > > > > > > On Friday the contributors working on Java API discovered a potential > > > performance problem with inference using Java API vs. Python. > > Investigation > > > is ongoing. > > > As the Java API is one of the main features for the upcoming release, I > > > suggest to post-pone the code freeze towards end of this week. > > > > > > Please provide feedback and concern about the change in dates for code > > > freeze and 1.4.0 release. I will provide updates on progress resolving > > the > > > potential performance problem. > > > > > > Patrick - do you think it is possible to resolve the remaining issues > on > > MKL- > > > DNN this week, so we can consider GA for MKL-DNN with 1.4.0? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Steffen > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:26 AM Anton Chernov <mecher...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I'd like to remind everyone that 'code freeze' would mean cutting a > > > > v1.4.x release branch and all following fixes would need to be > > backported. > > > > Development on master can be continued as usual. > > > > > > > > Best > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > ср, 14 нояб. 2018 г. в 6:04, Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community, > > > > > the agreed plan was to establish code freeze for 1.4.0 release > > > > > today. As the 1.3.1 patch release is still ongoing I suggest to > > > > > post-pone the code freeze to Friday 16th November 2018. > > > > > > > > > > Sergey Kolychev has agreed to act as co-release manager for all > > > > > tasks > > > > which > > > > > require committer privileges. If anybody is interested to volunteer > > > > > as release manager - now is the time to speak up. Otherwise I will > > > > > manage > > > > the > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Steffen > > > > > > > > > > > >
