+1
On 7/19/19, 12:59 PM, "Zhu Zhaoqi" <zhaoqizh...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Lin Yuan <apefor...@gmail.com> 于2019年7月19日周五 上午12:06写道：
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:03 AM Chaitanya Bapat <chai.ba...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 definitely.
> >
> > Going forward,
> > MXNet repo as it stands has ~95,000+ lines of Python code [1]
> > OpenEdx has a million (10x) LOC and this mammoth effort of porting from
> > Python 2 to 3 is treated as a separate project named Incremental
> > Improvement. [2]
> > We can take inspiration from them and have a similar effort by calling
> > action from the community. Issues can be maintained in a separate JIRA
> > board to track high priority tasks.
> >
> > Also, I can see gluon-nlp adding themselves to the Python3 statement.
> Once
> > the vote passes, one of us could submit a PR to add MXNet as well.
> >
> > [1] https://codeclimate.com/
> > [2]
> >
> https://open.edx.org/blog/python-2-is-ending-we-need-to-move-to-python-3/
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 21:39, Kshitij Kalambarkar <
> > kshitijkalambar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 04:28 Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:15 PM Marco de Abreu <
> > marco.g.ab...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking at EOL is certainly a good idea! I think once we get
closer
> > to
> > > > > deprecation, we can check adoption statistics to make a
> well-informed
> > > > > decision that gives us the most advantages without dropping the
> ball
> > > on a
> > > > > majority of users (or supporting a branch that is going EOL soon).
> A
> > > > survey
> > > > > from 2018 [1] determined the following distribution:
> > > > > 3.5: 11%
> > > > > 3.6: 54%
> > > > > 3.7: 30%
> > > > >
> > > > > Deprecation for 3.5 is scheduled for 2020-09-13 [2]. Deprecation
> for
> > > 3.6
> > > > is
> > > > > scheduled for 2021-12-23 [2].Deprecation for 3.7 is scheduled
> > > > > for 2023-06-27 [2].
> > > > >
> > > > > Following the trend, I'd say that it would be a decision between
> > Python
> > > > 3.6
> > > > > and 3.7. Later on, I'd propose to check recent surveys and also
> have
> > a
> > > > > separate thread to determine if there's anything we're missing
> (e.g.
> > a
> > > > big
> > > > > company being unable to use Python 3.7). What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Marco
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]:
> > https://www.jetbrains.com/research/python-developers-survey-2018/
> > > > > [2]: https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:42 PM Yuan Tang <terrytangy...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I would suggest supporting Python 3.5+ since the earlier
versions
> > > have
> > > > > > reached end-of-life status:
> > > > > > https://devguide.python.org/devcycle/#end-of-life-branches
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 3:36 PM Pedro Larroy <
> > > > pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This would simplify CI, reduce costs and more. I think a
> followup
> > > > > > > question is what would be the mininum Python3 version
> supported?
> > > > > > > Depending on that we might be able to use type annotations for
> > > > example
> > > > > > > or other features.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Pedro.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:07 PM Yuan Tang <
> > > terrytangy...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:51 PM Yuxi Hu <
> darreny...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31 AM Tong He <
> > hetong...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Tong He
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Jake Lee <gstu1...@gmail.com> 于2019年7月18日周四 上午11:29写道：
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:27 AM Junru Shao <
> > > > > > > junrushao1...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:12 AM Anirudh Acharya <
> > > > > > > > > > anirudhk...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:03 AM Marco de Abreu <
> > > > > > > > > > > marco.g.ab...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Marco
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> schrieb am Do.,
> > 18.
> > > > Juli
> > > > > > > 2019,
> > > > > > > > > > > 19:59:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear MXNet community,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to reopen the discussion on
> deprecating
> > > > python2
> > > > > > > > > support.
> > > > > > > > > > > > This
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > would help modernize the design and
engineering
> > > > practice
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > MXNet
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > help
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > improve speed and quality.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For this purpose, I reopened the issue on this
> > > here:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/8703
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the consensus is towards the direction of
> > > dropping
> > > > > > > python2
> > > > > > > > > > > > support,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggest we announce our plan to drop python2
> > > support
> > > > in
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > next
> > > > > > > > > > > > > release,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and actually drop the support in the next
major
> > > > version.
> > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -sz
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Yuxi(Darren) Hu, Ph.D.
> > > > > > > > > Software Development Engineer
> > > > > > > > > Amazon Web Services
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
> > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
> >
> > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
> https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
> > ]
> > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
> > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
> >[image:
> > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
> > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
> >
>
