Update on the website:

Highlights:
- Broken links: a good amount of them have been fixed in this #16284
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/16284>, tutorials have been
reorganized (not yet deployed because of CI). A new 404 with quick links
has been added and deployed in #16287
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/16287>
- Broken Search: Search has been fixed in #16284
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/16284> and merged but not
deployed yet.
- Google index issues: new website seems to be indexed now, in this google
search: "MXNet NDArray" <https://www.google.com/search?q=mxnet+ndarray> new
website is the top result. Redirects for old links to new ones have been
added to the .htaccess, thanks Soji for the help! #16342
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/16342> is still waiting to
be merged but a manual update to the website has been done in the meanwhile.
- Automated analysis from google lighthouse scoring, compared to the old
website: Performance saw a > ~100% improvement, SEO saw a ~25% improvement,
and best practices improved by ~19%. Thanks Russell D. for running the
analysis.

Remaining
- *[high priority]* API docs are still missing some classes / packages /
methods. ETA for fix is EOW, root cause has been identified, we are still
deciding what's the best way forward for good discoverability as well as
good coverage and maintainability.
- Adding quick links to directly access Python API docs on homepage.

All the best,

Thomas Delteil

Le mar. 24 sept. 2019 à 19:15, Thomas DELTEIL <thomas.delte...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> @Philip Yes we're looking at link redirects for older links that might be
> hosted externally (using htaccess is my preferred way to handle it for now
> as you sugested) and we'll use a broken link checker to update the links
> that are hosted internally. We'll update the 404 to add an explanation on
> the website update. Google indexes will slowly update across the week so
> the google search issues will be less of a problem.
>
> If you find any such links yourself, or missing tutorials, please consider
> stepping up and helping fixing them. The more people get familiar with the
> new website architecture, the least likely it is to fall in a state of
> stalled updates like the previous one.
>
> For the sphinx issues in the python mini-website, missing API classes, if
> anybody is familiar with it, I'd love for us to bring back the automatic
> doc generation for each package so at least we have a list of all available
> classes in each sub package rather than relying on manual insertion of each
> class, which is brittle and not future proof. @Lin, Haibin
> <haibi...@amazon.com> if you have experience with it, could we sync up
> offline on how you suggest to do that based on your gluon-nlp experience?
>
> @Marco, I'm currently traveling for ICDAR in Sydney, and Aaron is on PTO
> in Europe, I'll try make time today to help with the fixes since it is
> impacting a lot of users.
>
> In the meanwhile, any help is appreciated, and more than the value of the
> fixes, let me repeat that there is tremendous value in having more people
> familiar with the website build pipelines. Aaron is the main owner for the
> docs but he is already super busy with all his other responsibilities. I'm
> available to help if anybody is stuck. I believe Aaron has updated the
> READMEs on how to test the websites locally, if they're not clear, feel
> free to contribute your own explanations or ask for help directly to me by
> email or on the discuss forum.
>
> Good hunting!
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 10:10, Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Good catch, Mu! Also good idea, Philip!
>>
>> Aaron and Thomas, are you going to work on this?
>>
>> -Marco
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 1:28 AM Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The questions I found are:
>> >
>> > 1. Not ever page contains, especially the homepage
>> >
>> >
>> http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/api/python/docs/_static/google_analytics.js
>> > 2. The correct tracking id is UA-96378503-1 instead of UA-96378503-11 in
>> >
>> >
>> http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/api/python/docs/_static/google_analytics.js
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:23 PM Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think the reason is that the google tracker is not included in the
>> new
>> > > website.
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:17 PM Marco de Abreu <
>> marco.g.ab...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> I checked the Google Analytics statistics and the launch of the new
>> > >> website reduced the traffic by over 80%:
>> > >>
>> > >> [image: image.png]
>> > >>
>> > >> (Please let me know if the image is not visible)
>> > >>
>> > >> How shall we handle this?
>> > >>
>> > >> Best regards,
>> > >> Marco
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:30 AM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> For the install page [1], I suggest to add the selection of backend
>> > >>> DeepNumpy [2] which will be more clean.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> [1] http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/index.html
>> > >>> [2] https://numpy.mxnet.io/#installation
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > >>> > From: kellen sunderland <kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 12:47 PM
>> > >>> > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
>> > >>> > Subject: Re: new website, docs code freeze
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > New site looks good.  I do notice that a few tutorials from the
>> old
>> > >>> site are
>> > >>> > missing (for example the TensorRT tutorial).  Any plans to bring
>> them
>> > >>> back?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 10:04 AM Haibin Lin <
>> > haibin.lin....@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > > Another issue I found with the current website: the Sphinx
>> object
>> > >>> > > inventory
>> > >>> > > <https://www.sphinx-
>> > >>> > doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/intersphinx.htm
>> > >>> > > l> file https://mxnet.apache.org/objects.inv is missing.
>> GluonNLP
>> > >>> > > relies on this file to link document across projects. Shall we
>> add
>> > it
>> > >>> > > back?
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Best,
>> > >>> > > Haibin
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 2:04 AM Lieven Govaerts <l...@mobsol.be>
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > > Hi,
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 at 06:28, Thomas DELTEIL
>> > >>> > > > <thomas.delte...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > > Thanks all for the feedback,
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > We'll send an email next week with the list of missing
>> > features,
>> > >>> > > content
>> > >>> > > > > and bugs that we plan to fix.
>> > >>> > > > > We took the option of releasing early, with some features
>> > >>> missing,
>> > >>> > > rather
>> > >>> > > > > than trying to be at feature parity with the old website
>> before
>> > >>> > > launching
>> > >>> > > > > the website.
>> > >>> > > > > The reason why we decided to do that is two-fold:
>> > >>> > > > > - playing catch-up with docs in master introduce daily
>> > conflicts
>> > >>> > > > > that
>> > >>> > > > need
>> > >>> > > > > to be resolved and introduce opportunity for errors
>> > >>> > > > > - by releasing early, we can take advantage of the community
>> > >>> > > > contributions
>> > >>> > > > > in modifying whatever the community feels like a better way
>> of
>> > >>> > > > > doing things.
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > One of the goals of the new website was to disentangle the
>> main
>> > >>> > > website,
>> > >>> > > > > now called "static_site" to the auto-generated docs. Now the
>> > >>> > > > > overall
>> > >>> > > site
>> > >>> > > > > is made of a main static site, with easy to modify content
>> and
>> > >>> > > > > easy to understand architecture for anybody familiar with
>> basic
>> > >>> > > > > html, and a collection of mini-websites for each language
>> > >>> bindings
>> > >>> > > > > that can be
>> > >>> > > built
>> > >>> > > > in
>> > >>> > > > > isolation and that are self-contained. Actually the new CI
>> jobs
>> > >>> > > > > builds
>> > >>> > > > all
>> > >>> > > > > of them in parallel independently.
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > There is PLENTY of room for improvement, it would be great
>> if
>> > the
>> > >>> > > > community
>> > >>> > > > > can help contribute to bring the new website at the same
>> level
>> > of
>> > >>> > > content
>> > >>> > > > > richness as the old one, and then even further.
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > Missing features:
>> > >>> > > > > - As pointed by Haibin, the API docs do not have the full
>> list
>> > of
>> > >>> > > > operators
>> > >>> > > > > and classes. There is a mix of auto-generated docs based on
>> > >>> > > > > packages,
>> > >>> > > and
>> > >>> > > > > some docs that are spelled out manually to improve the
>> logical
>> > >>> > > > organization
>> > >>> > > > > of the package where there is a need. The drawback with
>> > manually
>> > >>> > > > > listed classes in a package is that it's very easy to miss
>> > some.
>> > >>> > > > > If someone
>> > >>> > > > wanted
>> > >>> > > > > to build a sanity check that would automatically detect
>> which
>> > >>> > > > > classes
>> > >>> > > are
>> > >>> > > > > not in the documentation, or if someone knew how to enable
>> that
>> > >>> > > > > with sphinx, that would be a great addition to the python
>> docs
>> > >>> > > > > - There is missing content in the python tutorials, and the
>> > >>> > > > discoverability
>> > >>> > > > > could be improved. Some old tutorials have not been migrated
>> > >>> just yet.
>> > >>> > > > > - The nightly tests on tutorials have been disabled for now
>> > >>> > > > > - There is no "Download jupyter notebook" for tutorials just
>> > yet.
>> > >>> > > > > - Non-python tutorials might benefit from a blurb
>> description
>> > and
>> > >>> > > > > a
>> > >>> > > > better
>> > >>> > > > > content organization.
>> > >>> > > > > - Python tutorials could be better organized, have a picture
>> > >>> > > accompanying
>> > >>> > > > > their description
>> > >>> > > > > - There is no site-wide search, this is not an easy problem
>> to
>> > >>> > > > > solve to
>> > >>> > > > be
>> > >>> > > > > fair given the static nature of the website, but maybe an
>> > >>> external
>> > >>> > > plugin
>> > >>> > > > > might be able to give a half-way solution
>> > >>> > > > > - There is no version selector for the docs
>> > >>> > > > > - There is bug in search box of the python docs, but this is
>> > just
>> > >>> > > > > a
>> > >>> > > small
>> > >>> > > > > JS bug that can be fixed easily (on my list for next week)
>> > >>> > > > > - Most old links have not had a redirect put in place.
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > I noticed on the Ubuntu home page in the Developer dropdown
>> that
>> > >>> the
>> > >>> > > > link MXNet on Ubuntu
>> > >>> > > > <https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
>> > >>> > > > >with
>> > >>> > > > Nvidia
>> > >>> > > > <
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>>
>> https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/gpu-accelerated-applications/
>> > >>> > > mxnet/
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > doesn't work anymore, it points to:
>> > >>> > > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Also, on the MXNet 'getting started' page
>> > >>> > > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/get_started , the link
>> > "Ubuntu
>> > >>> > > > Installation Guide" at the bottom doesn't work either, it
>> points
>> > >>> to:
>> > >>> > > > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/ubuntu_setup.html
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > I suggest you do a scan of the new website to find these
>> dangling
>> > >>> links.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > regards,
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Lieven
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > > We'll formalize this in github issues next week, but they
>> are
>> > all
>> > >>> > > fairly
>> > >>> > > > > small and helping out on these would be a great way of
>> > >>> > > > > familiarizing yourself with the new website build system and
>> > >>> website
>> > >>> > architecture.
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >  Thanks all for the feedback, please keep it coming!
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > Thomas Delteil
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > Le sam. 21 sept. 2019 à 09:53, Haibin Lin
>> > >>> > > > > <haibin.lin....@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > It looks like my previous email did not go through.
>> > Re-sending:
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > Hi Aaron,
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > The website looks cool. Thanks for pushing this to
>> > production.
>> > >>> A
>> > >>> > > > > > few
>> > >>> > > > > > questions:
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > - I was looking for the API doc for mx.sym.dot, but I find
>> > that
>> > >>> > > > > > most operators under mx.sym.* are missing. Is this
>> expected?
>> > >>> > > > > > - I was also checking the search functionality, searching
>> the
>> > >>> > > > > > keyword "ndarray" only returns one result
>> > >>> > > > > > "mxnet.ndarray.NDArray", which
>> > >>> > > > doesn't
>> > >>> > > > > > seem right. There animation keeps going (Searching. ->
>> > >>> > > > > > Searching.. -> Searching ...) and gives me an impression
>> that
>> > >>> > > > > > the search is never completely done(?).
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > Best,
>> > >>> > > > > > Haibin
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:50 PM Chaitanya Bapat <
>> > >>> > > chai.ba...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Thanks Aaron and the team for launching new website!
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > 1. There's no search button anywhere on the landing
>> page.
>> > >>> > > > > > > 2. I wasn't able to find FAQ (and without search button
>> I
>> > >>> dont
>> > >>> > > > > > > have
>> > >>> > > > > > option
>> > >>> > > > > > > but to go manually on each menu). Only when I go to
>> > >>> > > > > > > Docs&Tutorials
>> > >>> > > ->
>> > >>> > > > > FAQ
>> > >>> > > > > > > -> Extend and Cotribute (that I got what I wanted).
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Suggestions
>> > >>> > > > > > > Might want to make this searchable and pop FAQ on the
>> main
>> > >>> > > > > > > page (or somewhere prominent)
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > >>> > > > > > > Chai
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 14:58, Przemysław Trędak <
>> > >>> > > ptre...@apache.org>
>> > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > There seems to be a problem with (at least Python, did
>> > not
>> > >>> > > > > > > > check
>> > >>> > > > > > others)
>> > >>> > > > > > > > APIs. For example this page:
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> >
>> > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/api/python/docs/api/symbol/_autogen
>> > >>> > > /mxnet.symbol.Symbol.argmax.html
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > says that it is a convenience method for argmax (with
>> a
>> > >>> > > > > > > > link),
>> > >>> > > but
>> > >>> > > > > > > > clicking that link just points to the same website
>> (and
>> > so
>> > >>> > > > > > > > user
>> > >>> > > has
>> > >>> > > > > no
>> > >>> > > > > > > way
>> > >>> > > > > > > > of getting to the docs of the actual operator).
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > When I tried to manually remove Symbol from the URL to
>> > get
>> > >>> > > > > > > > to mxnet.symbol.argmax.html, I got a "Not found"
>> webpage
>> > >>> > > > > > > > which I
>> > >>> > > guess
>> > >>> > > > > > also
>> > >>> > > > > > > > should not happen (ignoring the fact that this should
>> > >>> exist,
>> > >>> > > going
>> > >>> > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > random URL under the website should redirect to the
>> main
>> > >>> > > > > > > > page I
>> > >>> > > > > think).
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > Przemek
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > On 2019/09/20 16:41:28, Lin Yuan <apefor...@gmail.com
>> >
>> > >>> wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > Looks very neat. Thank you Aaron and many others for
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > launching
>> > >>> > > > > this!
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:31 AM Carin Meier <
>> > >>> > > > carinme...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > Nice!!! Congrats everyone!
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:28 AM Aaron Markham <
>> > >>> > > > > > > > aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Alrighty! The new site is launched. You might
>> need
>> > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > clear
>> > >>> > > > > your
>> > >>> > > > > > > > cache.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Aaron
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 3:33 PM Aaron Markham <
>> > >>> > > > > > > > aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone. The PRs passed CI, but please
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > continue
>> > >>> > > > > holding
>> > >>> > > > > > > > off on
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > docs and CI edits. Unless there are any
>> > objections,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > I'd
>> > >>> > > > like
>> > >>> > > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > launch
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > the new website today.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:46 AM Aaron Markham
>> <
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > aaron.s.mark...@gmail.com>
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > The last two PRs [1][2] for the new website
>> and
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > docs
>> > >>> > > have
>> > >>> > > > > > > passed
>> > >>> > > > > > > > CI
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > (finally). Please do not make changes to
>> /docs
>> > or
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > /ci
>> > >>> > > > until
>> > >>> > > > > > we
>> > >>> > > > > > > > get
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > these approved and merged. Every time
>> there's a
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > merge
>> > >>> > > > > > conflict
>> > >>> > > > > > > > it has
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > set us back a day or two while shepherding
>> the
>> > >>> PRs
>> > >>> > > > through
>> > >>> > > > > CI
>> > >>> > > > > > > > again.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless there are catastrophic issues
>> discovered
>> > >>> in
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > a
>> > >>> > > > > review,
>> > >>> > > > > > I
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > recommend that we hold any patches or
>> updates
>> > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
>> > >>> > > PRs
>> > >>> > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > follow-up
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > PRs.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > There are four steps to launch:
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Once the PRs are approved, the plan is to
>> > >>> merge
>> > >>> > > 15885
>> > >>> > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > delete
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > the
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > old content first.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Then immediately merge 15883 to add in
>> the
>> > new
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > CI
>> > >>> > > > flows
>> > >>> > > > > > and
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > updates
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > to the content Thomas and I have already had
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > merged in
>> > >>> > > > > 15884
>> > >>> > > > > > > [3].
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. I will change the website validation
>> Jenkins
>> > >>> > > pipeline
>> > >>> > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > point to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > the new pipeline.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. I will change the website publishing
>> Jenkins
>> > >>> > > pipeline
>> > >>> > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > point to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > its new pipeline as well. Once triggered,
>> the
>> > old
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > site
>> > >>> > > > will
>> > >>> > > > > > be
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > replaced with the new one.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Post launch we'll need to update the DNS for
>> > >>> > > > beta.mxnet.io
>> > >>> > > > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > point
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > to
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > production, and there will likely be some
>> > >>> > > > > redirect/.htaccess
>> > >>> > > > > > > > updates
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > needed next week to assist with any deep
>> > linking
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > and
>> > >>> > > 404
>> > >>> > > > > > issues
>> > >>> > > > > > > > that
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > pop up.
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Aaron
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]
>> > >>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15885
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > [2]
>> > >>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15883
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > [3]
>> > >>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15884
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > --
>> > >>> > > > > > > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat*
>> > >>> > > > > > > *+1 (973) 953-6299*
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > > > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
>> > >>> > > > > > > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image:
>> > >>> > > > > > https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat
>> > >>> > > > > > > ]
>> > >>> > > > > > > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image:
>> > >>> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya]
>> > >>> > > > > > ><https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya
>> > >>> > > > > > >[image:
>> > >>> > > > > > > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25]
>> > >>> > > > > > > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/>
>> > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > > >
>> > >>> > > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to