Hi Chaitanya, The last I checked( a couple of months back) there are a few customers/users of MXNet in Amazon who use ONNX in production.
The last commit for ONNX module was on Aug 29th - b7cca015553d707cd1c4ce292826d7311309419c So IMO disabling any of the tests is not a good idea. Thanks Anirudh On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 12:27 PM Chaitanya Bapat <chai.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello MXNet community, > > I wanted to know if MXNet should continue support for ONNX. Is there anyone > actively working on MXNet ONNX or maintaining it? > > If not, can we skip/disable the ONNX tests from the CI. > Reason - Whilst working on a Transpose operator PR [1], I encountered > failure for ONNX [2]. Given operator passes rest of the CI pipeline tests. > I am able to reproduce the error. However, the root cause for ONNX model > failure couldn't be found. Moreover, there seems to be near zero activity > as far as PR check-ins are concerned. > > How does ONNX fit in for MXNet going forward? > Thank you > Chai > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/16104 > [2] > > http://jenkins.mxnet-ci.amazon-ml.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/mxnet-validation%2Funix-cpu/detail/PR-16104/14/pipeline > > -- > *Chaitanya Prakash Bapat* > *+1 (973) 953-6299* > > [image: https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25] > <https://github.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: https://www.facebook.com/chaibapat > ] > <https://www.facebook.com/chaibapchya>[image: > https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya] <https://twitter.com/ChaiBapchya>[image: > https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapat25] > <https://www.linkedin.com//in/chaibapchya/> >
