I agree, In the meanwhile. @Leonard I think we should ask trademark@apache whether they would approve the use of
repo names: mxnet-cu80 mxnet-cu10 etc, given that - they are distributed by individual contributors(as individuals and not as ASF PPMC members), - marked as thirdparty binary - Build from the original ASF source with no modifications, while with an "optional build config" that enables CUDA acceleration support, which abides the rules in https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/downstream.html TQ On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:06 AM Markus Weimer <wei...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 10:50 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > Seems the conclusion so far is only release source through apache and > > release the binary builds as third party(as a different community, a > > company or individual) > > Yes, that is the precedent established in multiple projects. I think > it might still be worthwhile to pursue an exception from nvidia, > though. Do we have any nvidia employees on the list that can inquire > about that? > > Markus >
