I just read the Shale proposal, and I don't see why we can't have both sides work together on this.
Assuming that the View tier of Shale is pluggable, I don't see why MyFaces couldn't have the responsibility of developing a plugin for the view. On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 01:46:57 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What is the main pruposal of MyFaces? I see > a: the need of an open source implementation of JSF and > b: like the idea to implement 'extras' to give the open source > implamantation a real meaning to use it *g* > > In my opinion shale and similar projects are trying to fill a gap for > existing applications or programmers which have not the possibility to > change to jsf completly. I developed a application for a company with realy > many cooperations so struts ore jsf was no alternative for us because of > branding problems and similars. I would realy like to see the focus of the > MyFaces on the JSF implementation with performance and stability with the > plus of realy needed or 'neat' components to higher the aceptance. Trying to > assimilate the one or other project should be the third or further focus to > get some attention for developers which have not the chance to decide which > technology to use but giving them a plus for the decicionmaker. My opinion > is definetly egoistic but i think it is the only chance to deliver > extraordinary good code. (even better than sun's (sooorry lars *g* )). > > It that sense and do not flame me please > > Carsten Fregin > > P.S. > This is my 11 beer with my investor so please are mercyfull with my bad > english and typos *g* > -- -Heath Borders-Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
