No. I think new components will finally end up in tomahawk, cause this might be the name for our central component repository.
I think a myfaces-all.jar will also contain the sandbox components - why would they not be in there? it is just necessary to clearly mark them as sandbox (e.g. using a new taglib, as was proposed by Sean) so that the users know what they get. regards, Martin On 5/27/05, Grant Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable. However, just to be clear... Will new components start > off in the sandbox, then get promoted to tomahawk, and then finally to > myfaces ? I guess I don't understand the need for the intermediate step. > > +1 for myfaces-all.jar, although I don't think it should contain sandbox > components (which is I think what everyone else is saying). > > You mentioned SVN changes / reorg. Would that be a new repository ? If so, > do we need to request that from the infrastructure people, or can we do it > ourselves ? > > > Sean Schofield wrote: > Actually I forgot to mention my idea for sandbox. I think we should > have a separate jar file for the sandbox (myfaces-sandbox.jar) It > would have the necessary share code + sandbox specifcic TLD + its own > javadoc. > > My thinking is that we have a sandbox bundle but that we never > formally release it (since its just a sandbox.) So you can build from > source or get a nightly sandbox-05272005.tar.gz. > > So us MyFaces developers who use MyFaces implementation (instead of > RI) would have two jar files in our path: myfaces-all.jar and > myfaces-sandbox.jar > > What do you think? > > sean > > On 5/27/05, Sylvain Vieujot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 on myfaces-all.jar too. > > Maybe it should include the future sandbox's files too. > So maybe a myfaces.jar, same as we have today, and a myfaces-all.jar that > will also includes the sandbox files. > > Sylvain. > > > > On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 11:32 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > +1 on myfaces-all.jar > ;) > > On 5/27/05, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree with Martin that the jar with all the stuff is very useful, at > > least > > > for me that I update the jar very often. With only one jar I can discard > that I have done a mistake deploying the jars when an exception or error > > is > > > thrown. My 2 euro cents... > > Bruno > > 2005/5/27, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I would still supply a catch-it-all you get it all jar file. > > It's just so much easier, and there are many frameworks supplying > something like that. > > To avoid confusion, we should name it: > > myfaces-all.jar > > though, I think! > > regards, > > Martin > > On 5/27/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can someone please elaborate on what the "shared" code contains and > why it is in "quotes"? :-) > > This refers to the code currently in the trunk under src/share. It > refers to code that is used in both the implentation as well as the > custom components. > > > > John Fallows. > > sean > > > > > > > . > > > >
