Sorry, I meant the date of the working JSP2.1 implementation in tomcat..

regards,

Martin

On 7/7/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked at the JavaOne, and there was nothing like a fixed date...
> 
> regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 7/7/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jacob,
> >
> > thanks. but some more...
> >
> > > JSF RI 1.2 still works
> > > without JSP 2.1, but only with an alternative ViewHandler that isn't
> > > dependent on JSP 2.1 (ex Facelets or possibly Clay).  For example,
> > > Facelets just uses the EL-API and EL-RI from Glassfish and now the JSF
> > > 1.2 'spec' can be used in older web containers.
> >
> > ok. do you know if the tomcat folks are working on jsp 2.1 container?
> >
> > and do you can a date, when jsf 1.2 will be final ?
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > > -- Jacob
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >
> > > >Jacob,
> > > >
> > > >just a question
> > > >
> > > >glassfish is sun's app server, isn't it?
> > > >so its "new EL-API" dependency is *new* EL for JSF1.2 and JSP 2.1 ?
> > > >
> > > >if so ... does glassfish currently contain a jsp 2.1 web container?
> > > >
> > > >-Matthias
> > > >
> > > >On 7/7/05, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>I will check licensing with Sun after their break.  The licensing has
> > > >>more to do with the new EL-API dependencies from Glassfish than it does
> > > >>with the JSF-RI.
> > > >>
> > > >>-- Jacob
> > > >>
> > > >>Martin Marinschek wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>We have just been discussing your technology in a Thread, and were
> > > >>>very interested in using it.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Thanks for keeping us updated!
> > > >>>
> > > >>>One thing: there is a licensing issue if we would want to use your
> > > >>>technology in MyFaces - now I'd like to ask just theoretically: is
> > > >>>there any way you would be able to change licensing to a less
> > > >>>restrictive license?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>regards,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>Martin
> > > >>>
> > > >>>On 7/7/05, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>I just released an early access of Facelets which works with MyFaces,
> > > >>>>JSF RI 1.1 and 1.2.  Also included in the release are a couple demo
> > > >>>>applications that you can deploy with the MyFaces dependencies.
> > > >>>>Facelets acts as an alternative JSF templating technology that can be
> > > >>>>used independent of JSP.  This means you can use JSF and create
> > > >>>>UIComponents without worrying about JSF taglibs.  Its syntax is 
> > > >>>>similar
> > > >>>>to JSPX crossed with Tapestry.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Home Page:
> > > >>>>https://facelets.dev.java.net
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Facelets Early Access 0.5:
> > > >>>>https://facelets.dev.java.net/files/documents/3448/16918/facelets-0.5ea.zip
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>I'm hoping that people will download it and give it a try.  I'm 
> > > >>>>looking
> > > >>>>for any feedback and ideas on steering the features that Facelets will
> > > >>>>include before its 1.0 release.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>All the Best,
> > > >>>>Jacob Hookom (JSF EG/Glassfish)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>--
> > > >>Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
> > > >>--------------------------
> > > >>http://hookom.blogspot.com
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
> > > --------------------------
> > > http://hookom.blogspot.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
>

Reply via email to