AFAIK, JSF 1.2 won't be really 'final' until Java EE 5 is final.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:24 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: MyFaces w/ Facelets
> 
> Ed Burns (JSF co-spec lead) usually tags his emails with how many days
> are left on the specification (a count down if you will).  At the end
of
> June, his email said that there were 20 usable days left on the
> specification-- so again I'm thinking end of July or early August at
the
> latest.
> 
> Martin Marinschek wrote:
> 
> >I asked at the JavaOne, and there was nothing like a fixed date...
> >
> >regards,
> >
> >Martin
> >
> >On 7/7/05, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Jacob,
> >>
> >>thanks. but some more...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>JSF RI 1.2 still works
> >>>without JSP 2.1, but only with an alternative ViewHandler that
isn't
> >>>dependent on JSP 2.1 (ex Facelets or possibly Clay).  For example,
> >>>Facelets just uses the EL-API and EL-RI from Glassfish and now the
JSF
> >>>1.2 'spec' can be used in older web containers.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>ok. do you know if the tomcat folks are working on jsp 2.1
container?
> >>
> >>and do you can a date, when jsf 1.2 will be final ?
> >>
> >>-Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>-- Jacob
> >>>
> >>>Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Jacob,
> >>>>
> >>>>just a question
> >>>>
> >>>>glassfish is sun's app server, isn't it?
> >>>>so its "new EL-API" dependency is *new* EL for JSF1.2 and JSP 2.1
?
> >>>>
> >>>>if so ... does glassfish currently contain a jsp 2.1 web
container?
> >>>>
> >>>>-Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>On 7/7/05, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>I will check licensing with Sun after their break.  The licensing
has
> >>>>>more to do with the new EL-API dependencies from Glassfish than
it does
> >>>>>with the JSF-RI.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>-- Jacob
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Martin Marinschek wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>We have just been discussing your technology in a Thread, and
were
> >>>>>>very interested in using it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Thanks for keeping us updated!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>One thing: there is a licensing issue if we would want to use
your
> >>>>>>technology in MyFaces - now I'd like to ask just theoretically:
is
> >>>>>>there any way you would be able to change licensing to a less
> >>>>>>restrictive license?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>regards,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Martin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On 7/7/05, Jacob Hookom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I just released an early access of Facelets which works with
MyFaces,
> >>>>>>>JSF RI 1.1 and 1.2.  Also included in the release are a couple
demo
> >>>>>>>applications that you can deploy with the MyFaces dependencies.
> >>>>>>>Facelets acts as an alternative JSF templating technology that
can be
> >>>>>>>used independent of JSP.  This means you can use JSF and create
> >>>>>>>UIComponents without worrying about JSF taglibs.  Its syntax is
similar
> >>>>>>>to JSPX crossed with Tapestry.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Home Page:
> >>>>>>>https://facelets.dev.java.net
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Facelets Early Access 0.5:
>
>>>>>>>https://facelets.dev.java.net/files/documents/3448/16918/facelets
-0.5ea.zip
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I'm hoping that people will download it and give it a try.  I'm
looking
> >>>>>>>for any feedback and ideas on steering the features that
Facelets will
> >>>>>>>include before its 1.0 release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>All the Best,
> >>>>>>>Jacob Hookom (JSF EG/Glassfish)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
> >>>>>--------------------------
> >>>>>http://hookom.blogspot.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>--
> >>>Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
> >>>--------------------------
> >>>http://hookom.blogspot.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>Matthias Wessendorf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Jacob Hookom - Minneapolis
> --------------------------
> http://hookom.blogspot.com
> 
> 


Reply via email to