+1
+1
+1
There's 3 for ya ;)
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: jmitchtx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Schofield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: proposal: consolodate examples/standard & examples/simple
Can we get a few more +1's for this?
sean
On 7/7/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
yes now the cobwebs are clearing...
if we get agreement I'd be up for getting rid of standard and making
a JSCookMenu example.
TTFN,
-bd-
On Jul 7, 2005, at 2:20 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
> A little background ...
>
> I created the simple examples because they had way less HTML
> cluttering them up because they were not running inside of menus, etc.
> We still needed an example that showed off JSCookMenu so people
> argued that we should keep the old examples around for this purpose.
>
> When I did the reorg, I created an svn:external for the src in simple
> so that it points to the standard. So the source code is *exactly*
> the same.
>
> I would like to stop maintaining the two sets of examples as you
> propose. When we create a new component nobody is going to want to
> add it to both examples and so they will get hopelessly out of sync
> over time. I would suggest dropping standard examples and adding a
> few fancy JSCookMenu examples, etc. to simple (that show off what
> standard was trying to do.) That will take a little bit of time so we
> need a volunteer (if we can get agreement.)
>
> sean
>
> On 7/7/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It appears that the code in examples/standard and the code in simple/
>> standard is the same. Any objections to getting rid of one or the
>> other?
>>
>> TTFN,
>>
>> -bd-
>>
>
