We have a better way of putting onload stuff in with dojo anyways. So that bodyTagEvent will go.
regards, Martin On 3/1/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > Currently I try to get rid of the buffering of the extension filter. (No > code yet, just many many thoughts about it) > > First of all: Who says we have to render the <script src= stuff in > html-head? > > I tried a short XHTML and checked it on http://validator.w3.org/check - > it didnt complain about it. > A short look in > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/xhtml11_dtd.html#a_xhtml11_dtd shows > > <!-- These elements are neither block nor inline, and can > essentially be used anywhere in the document body. > --> > <!ENTITY % Misc.class > "%Edit.class; > %Script.class; > %Misc.extra;" > > > > so this makes me thinking we can get rid of it without any troubles. > > So why cant we just render the script in place and are fine with it. > > Just the JsValueChangeListener is an exception which know a > "bodyTagEvent" attribute. But I think we can get rid of it and handle > this through the new to come documentBody tag. > > There are also other ideas, but I will discuss them after I know why we > can NOT get rid of the script tag in html-head ;-) > > Ciao, > Mario > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
