Maybe we should check in Stan's work and just remove the TC 6 stuff. I can't imagine he did a lot with the EL or content interweaving but maybe I am wrong. I'm ok with checking in his stuff now and letting you get started to strip away the TC 6 stuff.
Sean On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, so that's what we ought to do - releasing a MILESTONE release shouldn't be a problem. regards, Martin On 5/25/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 5/25/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You'd better read the spec license again A package that implements > some of > > > the "javax.*" APIs from a spec needs to implement *all* of them. > > > > @ Craig: Is this different the the 1.1 spec license? I seem to recall > > a compromise solution where we released as "milestone." Is that no > > longer an option? > > > No, it's not different. Milestone/EA/Alpha/Beta/etc. are fine (as would be > nightly builds that are not formally a release). Final/GA releases are not > fine. > > Craig > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
