Most of what I did relies on Unified EL.  In fact, the EL integration is
completely done except that the components haven't been converted to use
it.  The components still work though because I also did all the
backward-compatibility stuff for 1.1 style components.  

Almost all of the new API's rely on Unified EL at least indirectly.  

I see nothing to be gained by having a TC 5 / 1.2 branch.  I really
don't see what the point would be.  Maybe I missed something earlier in
the thread.

I also don't understand why you need a TC 6 release to do 1.2
development.  I've been working with JSF 1.2 stuff on TC 6 for a few
months now.  It works fine for development purposes.

That being said, I'm fine with whatever you guys decide.  Just let me
know when/if you want the code.

Stan Silvert
JBoss, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
callto://stansilvert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:02 PM
> To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Multiple SVN Branches (Was --> Re: JSF 1.2)
> 
> Maybe we should check in Stan's work and just remove the TC 6 stuff.
> I can't imagine he did a lot with the EL or content interweaving but
> maybe I am wrong.  I'm ok with checking in his stuff now and letting
> you get started to strip away the TC 6 stuff.
> 
> Sean
> 
> On 5/25/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok, so that's what we ought to do - releasing a MILESTONE release
> > shouldn't be a problem.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 5/25/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/25/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > You'd better read the spec license again   A package that
> implements
> > > some of
> > > > > the "javax.*" APIs from a spec needs to implement *all* of
them.
> > > >
> > > > @ Craig: Is this different the the 1.1 spec license?  I seem to
> recall
> > > > a compromise solution where we released as "milestone."  Is that
no
> > > > longer an option?
> > >
> > >
> > > No, it's not different.  Milestone/EA/Alpha/Beta/etc. are fine (as
> would be
> > > nightly builds that are not formally a release).  Final/GA
releases
> are not
> > > fine.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >

Reply via email to