OK there is an updated release candidate up there now. Can someone check it to make sure Dennis' logging stuff made it in? I need to leave the office for a bit. Once this is confirmed we can start the vote thread. (In the meantime I will be preparing the artifacts for an anticipated release.)
Sean On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Never mind. I see that you committed to the shared trunk. I merged it up to the branch for you. Sean On 6/7/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right but it will be recompiled into tomahawk via maven. You checked > it into the shared branch right? > > Sean > > On 6/6/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The logging stuff actually was in shared though. > > > > Dennis Byrne > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2006 11:02 PM > > >To: 'MyFaces Development' > > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release > > > > > >OK so you will check your fix into the trunk then? The current 1.1.3 > > >snapshot isn't technically the release candidate because of the > > >logging changes that Dennis made. I'll put together the official > > >release candidate tomorrow (Wednesday.) > > > > > >Sean > > > > > >On 6/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I figured out that treeTable's links aren't working, when using RI > > >> But to me no showstopper. > > >> > > >> So let's use 1.1.3-Snapshot as a RC > > >> > > >> -Matthias > > >> > > >> On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > The logging was actually in shared BTW. > > >> > > > >> > Dennis Byrne > > >> > > > >> > >-----Original Message----- > > >> > >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM > > >> > >To: 'MyFaces Development' > > >> > >Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release > > >> > > > > >> > >OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release. > > >> > >Thanks for the help. You are a MyFaces animal these days. Glad to > > >> > >have you back on full time! > > >> > > > > >> > >Sean > > >> > > > > >> > >On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> Sean- > > >> > >> > > >> > >> TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me... > > >> > >> I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing. > > >> > >> For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked > > >> > >> there for me. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> I go ahead and close this issue. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> -Matthias > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > Yes, Ill give it a try this evening (PST). > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > -Matthias > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release? > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > Sean > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2 > > >> > >> > > > release so I don't consider these showstoppers. Anyone disagree? > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > That leaves one last bug. TOMAHAWK-458. Can folks take a quick look > > >> > >> > > > at this one. > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > Sean > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > Jira issue created. > > >> > >> > > > > Will give RI tomorrow / friday a more detailed try! > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > -Matthias > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > Matthias, > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Can you add a few JIRA issues with fix version as 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT. > > >> > >> > > > > > That will allow us to keep track of the outstanding issues. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Sean > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > RI makes some trouble with this build of Tomahawk. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links are not working (sortable table for instance) > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some links I must trigger twice to get a *result* (scrolling through a table) > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Some exceptions on the jsf page (instead of rendered output) > > >> > >> > > > > > > -forceId,jsp makes troubles > > >> > >> > > > > > > duplicated IDs > > >> > >> > > > > > > commandLink id=button inside form id=forceIdForm > > >> > >> > > > > > > commandButton id=button inside form id=dataTable > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > both are forceId=true > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > for me it should be fine, since their jsf client id is > > >> > >> > > > > > > a)forceIdForm:button > > >> > >> > > > > > > b)dataTable:button > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > but not all components are making problems > > >> > >> > > > > > > -fileupload or tree2 are working fine. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > -Matthias > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > On 5/31/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Just check the updated brunch. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Now the *rc* looks good to me! > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Each sample works w/ MyFaces as JSF runtime. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Will give it a try w/ RI as JSF runtime > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > -Matthias > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Patch has been applied. Can we do a little more basic testing on > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > this? I will try to finish up the release process and start a vote > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > thread tomorrow. We should have some basic testing first though in > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > order that we not have any embarassing mistakes like the one Matthias > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > found. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Sean > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks, i'm glad to be here :) > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sure, i'll prepare a patch and send it to you, i don't have commit rights > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > yet. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Catalin > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Catalin, > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Welcome to the team. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Your dummy form explanation is probably correct. Someone added a > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > bunch of tags to many of the examples but probably not all. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Can you add them to the tomahawk branch? If you can't commit yet just > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > send me the patch. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sean > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > I tested also those pages with the latest from SVN, a first problem is > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > that > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > they are missing an enclosing . Maybe now this a problem, cause the > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > dummy form is no more added? not sure though. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Catalin > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield wrote: @Matthias: Thanks for > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > testing > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > @Everyone: Any ideas on these? > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > mvn install for tomahawk 1_1_3 worked for me. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Installed the simple example war. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Some "pages" causing trouble: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -sortTable.jsf (not working; click on a link has no efect) > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -sortAutoTable.jsf (same) > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -pagedSortTable.jsf (clicking on the scroller icons has no effect, > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > when you click first time. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > summary: for navigation to next page (after page has rendered first > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > time) it needs two clicks. after that each click goes to the next > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > page, as expected) > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > same for upload example too > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Tree2 is working fine > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/26/06, Sean Schofield wrote: > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I made a tomahawk 1_1_3 branch but its not compiling at the moment. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > The references to jsf api and impl are 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT since 1.1.3 is > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > not in ibiblio yet (we need to take care of that btw.) I will change > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > them before the official release. That shouldn't make a difference > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > though. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to be offline for the weekend. Can some people take a look > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > at this over the weekend and do some basic testing? Just do a mvn > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > install after checking out the branch (no RC yet.) > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > rates. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta. > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > >> > >> > > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > >> > >> > > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > >> > >> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > >> > >> > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > >> > >> > > > > > > http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > -- > > >> > >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > Aechterhoek 18 > > >> > >> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten > > >> > >> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > >> > >> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > -- > > >> > >> > Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > >> > Aechterhoek 18 > > >> > >> > 48282 Emsdetten > > >> > >> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > >> > >> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> Matthias Wessendorf > > >> > >> Aechterhoek 18 > > >> > >> 48282 Emsdetten > > >> > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > >> > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Matthias Wessendorf > > >> Aechterhoek 18 > > >> 48282 Emsdetten > > >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
