I see the primary use of resolved versus closed as keeping/generating a log of what's changed during a release. Things that don't impact a release (non-fixes) don't need to have a resolved state.
I have never had a need to revisit an invalid issue. Won't fix hasn't come up yet. Users can already reopen closed issues. Even if they couldn't, a comment posted to the issue (or the mailing list) would have me reopen an issue. On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you do it so this is only required for Fixed issues? > Invalid/Won't Fix issues should be closed directly. Why should these be closed directly? Maybe we would revisit one of these before the release is done. Also, I believe having them resolved (instead of closed) allows the user to appeal and reopen. Just some thoughts ... Sean
