Ok, since the feedback was mostly negative and one -1 voting and no +1s I removed the maintainers but kept the kategorization, I really need the cats for future testing purposes. Also the feedback on the idea of categorizing the components was positive:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ComponentCategorization is the new page. Werner Bruno Aranda schrieb: > Good points in this thread. Yes, the list of components is ok, but > names should be removed right away. Even without putting the name > elsewhere (apart from being the author of those classes) you still get > personal mails about that classes/component. Let's delete the names, > then... and maybe, instead of having a new classification, we could > put the information in the existing component pages (e.g. uses dojo, > ...) > > Cheers, > > Bruno > > On 8/21/06, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I don't think anyone will disagree to a wiki page that shows the >> organization of the components. So +1 for that. >> >> Also I agree with; >> >> >> > We are all corporately responsible for all of the code, and have >> freedom >> to get involved with any of it. >> >> >> So -1 for stating committer names as the maintainer of each component. >> > > > >> Cagatay >> >> p.s. I'm really getting used to the +1, -1 business :) >> >> >> On 8/21/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Ok valid points are risen, that it is not Apache like... >> > I think a vote on whether we keep the page or not >> > might be good... >> > as I said, I wanted to achieve a different purpose >> > for this, namely to have categorized which >> > components are dojoized, so that I have it easier >> > to test after dojo upgrades (hence also >> > the current maintainers of the components) >> > but Craig and the others have risen a valid point. >> > Lets either vote on this, or just do it the wiki >> > way and remove yourself if you feel out of place >> > in there. >> > All I really need is some sort of component categorization >> > so that I can keep track of things... >> > I did not want to open a Pandoras box here. >> > >> > >> >> >
