Thanx Matthias, very useful link, but I meant the old tree component not tree2, which people who need a tree table should still use it (according to myfaces web site)
On 12/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.jroller.com/page/plainoldweblog?entry=use_tomahawk_tree2_and_ajax4jsf On 12/19/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > at least here is a "famous" blog, which shows the usage of tree2 and facelets > (with ajax4jsf) > > On 12/19/06, Arash Rajaeeyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > Since jacob is also here, it is a long time that some components like tree > > don't work well with facelets, is resolving the issues on the plan? > > > > > > On 12/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh, thanks! > > > > > > >Hi Jacob! > > > >> how's JSF 1.2 coming along btw? > > > >> > > > >What do you mean? > > > > > > > >As far as I can see JSF 1.2. do not introduce any new (flash or > > > >conversation) scope. > > > >So (IMHO) our solution works with JSF 1.2 too. > > > > > > > >If you mean how far our (MyFaces) JSF 1.2 implementation is ... well ... > > > >then I have to say there is another team working on it, I don't know. > > > > > > > > > > > >Ciao, > > > >Mario > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Arash Rajaeeyan > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > further stuff: > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Arash Rajaeeyan
