I went back and reread the "spring conversation scope and ejb". There's nothing in here stating that Mario was planning on starting a subproject or committing any code, so I don't think we're being too harsh when someone starts a new subproject without any warning, and we get concerned.
There needs to be some kind of discussion before a commit of this type, even if it's a single message. On 2/22/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Marinschek schrieb: > Don't hit to hard on Mario - he tried to start a discussion on this > list, but there was no response (it was not about the name fusion, but > about the technical details of the spring-conversation stuff). > Sometimes there needs to be a commit in open source, so that the > discussion can start. > > And I believe this discussion can definitely start now... > > regards, > > Martin > I agree here, I can remember the post, anyway, fusion will be a great addition, mario has pushed some stuff in it which is pure genious and makes life of all of us easier in the long run. (Since I am at the starting points of a project I am eager to test the spring conversation context in combination with jpa)
