I slightly have a better feeling w/ skipping 1.1.4 but let's document this very good ;)
-M On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
both sounds bad... no idea, funny enough, that almost every tomahawk release has a high dependency on the core code :) -M On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off. > We must decide between > - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core 1.1.4 and > therefore might confuse users > - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a tomahawk > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5 > > WDYT? > > --Manfred > > > On 2/23/07, Scheper, Erik-Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree. > > > > The old 1.1.4 RC is getting really aged now. > > However, it seems strange to just throw it away and follow-up 1.1.3 by 1.1.5 > > > > Regards, > > Erik-Berndt > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Van: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Verzonden: vr 23-2-2007 9:27 > > Aan: MyFaces Development > > Onderwerp: Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > +1 for throwing away 1.1.4, creating a new branch using current trunk and releasing 1.1.4. > > > > Cagatay > > > > > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Ok folks, I will try to start the release process for tomahawk next week. > > > > Well, regarding the branch there are various possibilities: > > - use the already existing 1.1.4 branch from Nov. 2006 and release 1.1.4 > > - throw away existing 1.1.4 branch, create new branch and release 1.1.4 > > - (optionally) throw away existing 1.1.4 branch, create new 1.1.5 > > branch, skip version number 1.1.4 and release 1.1.5 > > > > If we use one of the two "create new branch" strategies, which > > revision is stable enough. Current head? > > > > Thanks, > > Manfred > > > > > > > > On 2/22/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 on this idea. > > > > > > Tomahawk has settled down since the Dojo move and has been running > > > relatively stable. Best to ensure the next release is branched sometime > > > before any more big changes. (Tomahawk 1.1.4 RC is very good too) :) > > > > > > Paul Spencer wrote: > > > > We just completed a MyFaces 1.1.5 release, which resolved blockers > > > > related to Tomahawk. Can we get a Tomahawk release done before we start > > > > changing things for Fusion? > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Spencer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
