+1 for release number tomahawk 1.1.5 On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suggest releasing from the head with a version of 1.1.5. Releasing the head as 1.1.4 to me is more confusing for the following reasons: o It is currently called 1.1..5-SNAPSHOT o Issues are linked to 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT o Mailing list post refer to 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT o 1.1.4 has already gone through, although partially, a release process. o 1.1.4.1 has already gone through, although partially, a release process. o User searching the mailing list for 1.1.5 issues will have to determine if the post is for the first or second 1.1.5I do not have a problem with a missing 1.1.4 release, Tomcat does this all the time. The following statement is a concerning statement: "1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5" What does it mean? Are their related Jira issues? Paul Spencer Manfred Geiler wrote: > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off. > We must decide between > - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core 1.1.4 and > therefore might confuse users > - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a tomahawk > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5 > > WDYT? > > --Manfred > > > On 2/23/07, Scheper, Erik-Berndt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I agree. >> >> The old 1.1.4 RC is getting really aged now. >> However, it seems strange to just throw it away and follow-up 1.1.3 >> by 1.1.5 >> >> Regards, >> Erik-Berndt >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Van: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Verzonden: vr 23-2-2007 9:27 >> Aan: MyFaces Development >> Onderwerp: Re: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans? >> >> >> Hi, >> >> +1 for throwing away 1.1.4, creating a new branch using current trunk >> and releasing 1.1.4. >> >> Cagatay >> >> >> On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Ok folks, I will try to start the release process for tomahawk >> next week. >> >> Well, regarding the branch there are various possibilities: >> - use the already existing 1.1.4 branch from Nov. 2006 and >> release 1.1.4 >> - throw away existing 1.1.4 branch, create new branch and >> release 1.1.4 >> - (optionally) throw away existing 1.1.4 branch, create new 1.1.5 >> branch, skip version number 1.1.4 and release 1.1.5 >> >> If we use one of the two "create new branch" strategies, which >> revision is stable enough. Current head? >> >> Thanks, >> Manfred >> >> >> >> On 2/22/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > +1 on this idea. >> > >> > Tomahawk has settled down since the Dojo move and has been >> running >> > relatively stable. Best to ensure the next release is >> branched sometime >> > before any more big changes. (Tomahawk 1.1.4 RC is very good >> too) :) >> > >> > Paul Spencer wrote: >> > > We just completed a MyFaces 1.1.5 release, which resolved >> blockers >> > > related to Tomahawk. Can we get a Tomahawk release done >> before we start >> > > changing things for Fusion? >> > > >> > > >> > > Paul Spencer >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> This message contains information that may be privileged or >> confidential and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group >> members. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. >> If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, >> print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or >> any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify >> the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. >> >> > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
