JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.x JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 2.x
I'd rather keep the release numbers in sync with the spec numbers. 1.1 -> 1.1.x, 1.2 -> 1.2.x Paul Spencer
Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > we sould do the same for core > > next is 1.5.0 > > and JSF 1.2 stuff should be changed to 2.0.0 > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 1.5.0 or 1.6.0. One is as good as the other IMO. >> You mean 1.6.0 is better because it does not "match" the 1.1.5 of >> current core? >> I think Martin suggested 1.5.0 because it would be in the style of >> Tomcat 5.0.x vs Tomcat 5.5.x, right? >> >> --Manfred >> >> >> On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > If the version of Tomahawk is not tied to the version of MyFaces, then >> > how about the NEXT version of Tomahawk be 1.6? >> > >> > This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version independently >> of MyFaces. >> > >> > Paul Spencer >> > >> > Martin Marinschek wrote: >> > > slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well. >> > > >> > > other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get >> out of >> > > sync. >> > > >> > > regards, >> > > >> > > Martin >> > > >> > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Ok, thanks for your feedback. >> > >> Branch 1.1.5 created. >> > >> >> > >> --Manfred >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off. >> > >> > > We must decide between >> > >> > > - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core >> 1.1.4 and >> > >> > > therefore might confuse users >> > >> > > - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a >> > >> tomahawk >> > >> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5 >> > >> > >> > >> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be >> compatible with >> > >> > Core 1.1.5. >> > >> > >> > >> > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone asks >> "what >> > >> > happened" to 1.1.4. As Paul points out, Tomcat skips version >> numbers >> > >> > in their public release series.) >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Wendy >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >
-- Dennis Byrne
