Hi Dennis, the problem is that you don't have any leeway to change the MyFaces-API (read: not JSF API) incompatible to what it had been before. Well, given we finally reach the point at which we have a pretty stable API between bugfix-releases.
regards, Martin On 2/23/07, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JSF 1.1 -> MyFaces 1.x > JSF 1.2 -> MyFaces 2.x I'd rather keep the release numbers in sync with the spec numbers. 1.1 -> 1.1.x, 1.2 -> 1.2.x > Paul Spencer > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > we sould do the same for core > > > > next is 1.5.0 > > > > and JSF 1.2 stuff should be changed to 2.0.0 > > > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > >> 1.5.0 or 1.6.0. One is as good as the other IMO. > >> You mean 1.6.0 is better because it does not "match" the 1.1.5 of > >> current core? > >> I think Martin suggested 1.5.0 because it would be in the style of > >> Tomcat 5.0.x vs Tomcat 5.5.x, right? > >> > >> --Manfred > >> > >> > >> On 2/23/07, Paul Spencer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > If the version of Tomahawk is not tied to the version of MyFaces, then > >> > how about the NEXT version of Tomahawk be 1.6? > >> > > >> > This would allow Tomahawk, like Tobago, to be version independently > >> of MyFaces. > >> > > >> > Paul Spencer > >> > > >> > Martin Marinschek wrote: > >> > > slightly too late, but 1.1.5 would have been my option as well. > >> > > > >> > > other option: 1.5 - and let tomahawk and impl version numbers get > >> out of > >> > > sync. > >> > > > >> > > regards, > >> > > > >> > > Martin > >> > > > >> > > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Ok, thanks for your feedback. > >> > >> Branch 1.1.5 created. > >> > >> > >> > >> --Manfred > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2/23/07, Wendy Smoak < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > > The new tomahawk release number is a trade-off. > >> > >> > > We must decide between > >> > >> > > - releasing tomahawk 1.1.4 which is not compatible to core > >> 1.1.4 and > >> > >> > > therefore might confuse users > >> > >> > > - skipping tomahawk 1.1.4, stay in sync with core and have a > >> > >> tomahawk > >> > >> > > 1.1.5 that is 100% compatible to the current core 1.1.5 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > +1 for Tomahawk 1.1.5 this time around, which will be > >> compatible with > >> > >> > Core 1.1.5. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > (There is plenty of information in the archives if anyone asks > >> "what > >> > >> > happened" to 1.1.4. As Paul points out, Tomcat skips version > >> numbers > >> > >> > in their public release series.) > >> > >> > > >> > >> > -- > >> > >> > Wendy > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- Dennis Byrne
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
