Not yet, but I think it should eventually. This bridge is going to be
the standard as far as the JCP is concerned and the R.I. will be taken
from the work done here at Apache. It's going to evolve with Portal
standards (like JSR-286) and should be able to influence JSF 2.0 to
allow JSF to be more "portlet friendly".
Until work is done on Tomahawk, however, I imagine you would want to
continue to use the old Tomahawk bridge. That said, it's possible
Tomahawk will just work. A lot of effort has been made to try to
acknowledge the usecases set up by the current MyFaces renderkits. But
we won't know for sure until people start trying it out.
Scott
Alexander Wallace wrote:
Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge?
On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Sounds good to me. Should we open up a discussion though on "where"
this should be committed so that we can hit the ground running once
the paperwork is listed?
Scott
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey everyone. After tearing though the bureaucracy much slower then I
would have liked, I uploaded the code to MYFACES-1664 for the JSR-301
Portlet Bridge. This code should comply with the latest public
draft of
the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure out where to put this
and
get it made available in svn, I'd like to see people get their
hands on
it and try it out. It is going to change some things (for the
better I
hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues with it, my hope is
that
we can get those concerns voiced so that we can incorporate them into
the final draft.
That said, what are our next steps?
we have to wait with the commit, until that the paperworks (Schedule
B) is listed here:
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
-M
Scott
