Hey Scott,

did a quick look.
POMs and API .java class have to contain the Apache 2.0 license as well.

Greetings,
Matthias

PS: build runs .... :-)

On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there was no real tomahawk bridge.
> that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl)
>
> the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how a JSF 1.2
> application should work inside a portal.
>
> for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should run in a
> portlet..." (very simplified statement)
>
> So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java SPEC ;-)
>
> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge?
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds good to me.  Should we open up a discussion though on
> > > "where" this should be committed so that we can hit the ground
> > > running once the paperwork is listed?
> > >
> > > Scott
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey everyone.  After tearing though the bureaucracy much slower
> > >>> then I
> > >>> would have liked, I uploaded the code to  MYFACES-1664 for the
> > >>> JSR-301
> > >>> Portlet Bridge.  This code should comply with the latest public
> > >>> draft of
> > >>> the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure out where to put
> > >>> this and
> > >>> get it made available in svn, I'd like to see people get their
> > >>> hands on
> > >>> it and try it out.  It is going to change some things (for the
> > >>> better I
> > >>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues with it, my hope
> > >>> is that
> > >>> we can get those concerns voiced so that we can incorporate them
> > >>> into
> > >>> the final draft.
> > >>>
> > >>> That said, what are our next steps?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> we have to wait with the commit, until that the paperworks (Schedule
> > >> B) is listed here:
> > >> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
> > >>
> > >> -M
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> Scott
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org

Reply via email to