Someone who has commit rights to the incubator IP clearance page has to commit it there - so Michael couldn't have done so, I suppose. Has there be an Apache member taking this over?
regards, Martin On 8/31/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, supposedly. The work for the IP Clearance form was submitted by > the JSR-301 Project Lead on the 16th. At least that's what I was told > which is why he told me to go-ahead and submit it. But I haven't seen > it processed by Apache yet. > > Scott > > Martin Marinschek wrote: > > Hi Matthias, Scott, > > > > has the IP Clearance form already been filled out and committed? > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> but all this, can be fixed, when it's already committed. > >> > >> We needed NOTICE and LICENSE files inside both JARs as well. > >> > >> -M > >> > >> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> yes pom as well. > >>> > >>> and also files in: > >>> -META-INF/services/ > >>> -META-INF/ > >>> > >>> @myfaces: a bug .... > >>> > >>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hey, it looks like I did the impl, just not the API. I'm fixing that > >>>> now. > >>>> > >>>> That said, does the liscence need to be in the POM files? I didn't > >>>> notice a liscence in the MyFaces 1.2 POM files... I have no problems > >>>> putting it in, certainly, but we may want to make the 1.2 branch of > >>>> MyFaces compliant with this as well. > >>>> > >>>> Scott > >>>> > >>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hey Scott, > >>>>> > >>>>> did a quick look. > >>>>> POMs and API .java class have to contain the Apache 2.0 license as well. > >>>>> > >>>>> Greetings, > >>>>> Matthias > >>>>> > >>>>> PS: build runs .... :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> there was no real tomahawk bridge. > >>>>>> that stuff is part of myfaces 1.1 (the core impl) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> the difference here is that 301 specifies a way, how a JSF 1.2 > >>>>>> application should work inside a portal. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> for jsf 1.1 there was "just" a note like "JSF 1.1 should run in a > >>>>>> portlet..." (very simplified statement) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So, no not a replacement, "just" an IMPL of the java SPEC ;-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 8/17/07, Alexander Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Does this bridge replace Tomahawk bridge? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Sounds good to me. Should we open up a discussion though on > >>>>>>>> "where" this should be committed so that we can hit the ground > >>>>>>>> running once the paperwork is listed? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Scott > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone. After tearing though the bureaucracy much slower > >>>>>>>>>> then I > >>>>>>>>>> would have liked, I uploaded the code to MYFACES-1664 for the > >>>>>>>>>> JSR-301 > >>>>>>>>>> Portlet Bridge. This code should comply with the latest public > >>>>>>>>>> draft of > >>>>>>>>>> the JSR-301 specification and, once we figure out where to put > >>>>>>>>>> this and > >>>>>>>>>> get it made available in svn, I'd like to see people get their > >>>>>>>>>> hands on > >>>>>>>>>> it and try it out. It is going to change some things (for the > >>>>>>>>>> better I > >>>>>>>>>> hope), but if there are any unresolvable issues with it, my hope > >>>>>>>>>> is that > >>>>>>>>>> we can get those concerns voiced so that we can incorporate them > >>>>>>>>>> into > >>>>>>>>>> the final draft. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> That said, what are our next steps? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> we have to wait with the commit, until that the paperworks (Schedule > >>>>>>>>> B) is listed here: > >>>>>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -M > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Scott > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf > >>>>>> > >>>>>> further stuff: > >>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >>>>>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Matthias Wessendorf > >>> > >>> further stuff: > >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >>> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > >>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Matthias Wessendorf > >> > >> further stuff: > >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
