On 9/25/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm planning on help with the documentation, and plan to add a new > page to the WIKI for a "getting started" on using the > maven-faces-plugin with facelets and jsf 1.1.
That'd be awesome! > On the topic of what I brought up, would it be better to have the > component type ID filter be placed on the dynamic content only and not > on the included content (meaning the component tags from the plugin, > but do not filter the faces-config-base.xml content)? That would be great, but... it'd require some "fun" rearchitecting. The filtering is done in XSLT, after the merge with the base doc has already happened. I agree that it's totally wacky that you explicitly define something explicitly in faces-config-base.xml and then the tool says "nope, you must not have *really* wanted that"! -- Adam > > Is there a good reason that I can't think of at the moment to filter > all the faces-config content and not just the generated content? > > -Andrew > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We should probably get serious about at least documenting the big > > "gotchas" of the faces plugin. I've started a subsection at > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad_Plugins so we at least have > > somewhere to put this sort of info. Andrew, stuff like this that you > > discover would be great additions. > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After investigating the code more, it is working as designed, I just > > > expected different results. Please disregard this previous email of > > > mine. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andrew > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Changing my vote to a possible -1 for the release. > > > > > > > > I just posted an email about the plugin not including elements from > > > > the faces-config-base.xml into the faces-config.xml. Unless I screwed > > > > up somehow, I'd like to see if this can be fixed before the release. > > > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 9/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > [x] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits > > > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be > > > > > > released, > > > > > > and why.............. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > -- Adam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
